Baltimore Sun

Developers release plans for undoing canceled pipeline

- By Sarah Rankin

RICHMOND, Va. — The developers of the now-canceled Atlantic Coast Pipeline have laid out plans for how they want to go about unwinding the work that was done for the multistate natural gas project and restoring disturbed land.

In a filing with federal regulators made public this week, the pipeline company proposed an approximat­ely two-year timeline for efforts across West Virginia, Virginia and North Carolina, where progress on the project ranged from uninitiate­d to essentiall­y complete.

The plan outlines where the company wants to clean up felled trees and where it plans to leave them behind, and it proposes abandoning the approximat­ely 30 miles of pipe that was installed in place.

“We spent the last several months working really closely with landowners and agencies to develop the most responsibl­e approach for closing out the project,” said Aaron Ruby, an employee of lead developer Dominion Energy who has served as a spokesman for the joint project with Duke Energy. “And ultimately our primary goal is to complete the project as efficientl­y as possible, and with minimal environmen­tal disturbanc­e.”

Ruby also confirmed for the first time that the company does not intend to voluntaril­y release the easement agreements it secured on landowners’ properties.

In most cases, the legal agreements were obtained through negotiatio­ns with landowners, who were paid and who the company has previously said will keep their compensati­on. But in other cases, in which sometimes vociferous­ly opposed landowners fought the project, the easements were obtained through eminent domain proceeding­s.

Asked if there are any plans to sell the easement agreements to a third party such as another pipeline or infrastruc­ture project, Ruby said, “We have no plans to do so at this time.”

Ruby also said the company has no plans to voluntaril­y compensate landowners who are still in court fighting over the legal fees and other costs they incurred related to the project. On Dec. 18, a federal judge in North Carolina awarded one group of defendant landowners just over $20,000 in fees and costs.

Plans for the 600-mile Atlantic Coast Pipeline were first announced with great fanfare in 2014, but it was running years behind schedule. Legal challenges brought by environmen­tal groups prompted the dismissal or suspension of numerous permits and led to delays in constructi­on and ballooning costs that brought the estimated price tag to $8 billion. Building the project was to involve tree removal and blasting and leveling some ridgetops as the pipe, 42 inches in diameter for much of its path, crossed mountains, hundreds of water bodies and other sensitive terrain and burrowed underneath the Appalachia­n Trail.

On all properties with pipe in the ground, Atlantic is seeking to abandon that pipe in place, which Ruby said the company thinks will cause the least environmen­tal disturbanc­e.

The pipeline partners said July 5 in a surprise announceme­nt that the project was being canceled. In October, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission asked the pipeline to provide specific details about its planned restoratio­n activities.

Lewis Freeman, executive director of the Allegheny-Blue Ridge Alliance, a coalition of dozens of groups that opposed the project, said he hoped the commission would make Atlantic relinquish the easements upon request as a condition of approving the restoratio­n plan. That’s a request conservati­on groups made in a filing with the commission in August.

 ?? STEVE HELBER/AP 2018 ?? Plans for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline were announced to great fanfare in 2014, but the developers said in early July that the project was being canceled.
STEVE HELBER/AP 2018 Plans for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline were announced to great fanfare in 2014, but the developers said in early July that the project was being canceled.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States