Baltimore Sun

Harris to lead border response

Biden turns to the vice president to address migration challenge

- By Jonathan Lemire, Nomaan Merchant and Josh Boak

WASHINGTON — President Joe Biden has tapped Vice President Kamala Harris to lead the White House effort to tackle the migration challenge at the southern border.

Biden made the announceme­nt as he and Harris met at the White House on Wednesday with Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and other immigratio­n advisers to discuss the increase in migrants, including many unaccompan­ied minors, arriving at the border in recent weeks.

In delegating the matter to Harris,

Biden is seeking to replicate a dynamic from when he served as President Barack Obama’s vice president. Obama turned to Biden early in his first term to lead the White House effort to draw down U.S. troops in the intractabl­e war in Iraq.

“When she speaks, she speaks for me,” Biden said, noting her past work as California’s attorney general makes her specially equipped to lead the administra­tion’s response.

Biden is hoping to show Americans he’s taking the border situation seriously after facing stiff criticism from Republican­s as the flow of migrants has increased since he took office in January. The growing humanitari­an and political challenge at

“What exactly are we paying Ernst & Young millions of dollars to do that we couldn’t do with our own staff?” Franchot asked.

Webster Ye, the state’s assistant secretary for health policy, said the health department needed “all the help we can get” to meet Republican Gov. Larry Hogan’s goal of administer­ing 100,000 doses of the coronaviru­s vaccine every day, “with smooth data reporting to our federal and Maryland stakeholde­rs.”

He added that the department had not been “on constant standby for a once-in-acentury pandemic” and lacked “dedicated supply chain logisticia­ns” and forensic accountant­s.

Franchot and Kopp expressed irritation that Ye provided few details about a report that Ernst & Young was required to produce within seven days of its contract taking effect, after conducting “a comprehens­ive overall end-to-end assessment of the State’s COVID-19 Vaccinatio­n Program,” according to the contract proposal. It was one of at least three items the health department’s contract required Ernst & Young to produce.

Ye said Ernst & Young’s assessment led to the company helping with “first and second dose supply chain management,” preparing the state’s vaccinatio­n registrati­on system, data reporting and assisting with the state’s Vaccine Equity Task Force. As for producing the report, Ye said, “we didn’t ask for a report to stick on a bookshelf and look pretty.”

Kopp said she respected Ernst & Young and supported the decision to hire them for the vaccinatio­n effort but said it wasn’t appropriat­e for the department to “keep secret” the report. Rutherford agreed the report should be produced, saying Hogan’s administra­tion will “look into that.”

With Franchot’s and Kopp’s votes, the board also pushed back decisions on a contract awarded by the health department to Berkeley Research Group LLC for COVID-19 patient surge consulting and another for KPMG LLP with a similar descriptio­n. Together, the two emergency contracts were worth more than $1 million.

The health department failed to notify the state spending board of those two contracts, and seven others, within 45 days of signing, as prescribed by state law. Franchot said the gap left him “basically appalled.”

The health department notified the Board of Public Works within the required time frame of the Ernst & Young contract and a $25 million award to Digital Management LLC to stand up a vaccine call center in the state, which the board approved Wednesday.

Ye said the department was “working as fast as we can.”

The board next meets April 7, and Franchot said he hoped the delay would “provide MDH the time to better justify the spending” and provide the assessment report Ernst & Young was tasked with producing.

The state legislatur­e is considerin­g a proposal by Franchot to establish an independen­t, bipartisan commission to audit all of the state’s spending on relief for the coronaviru­s pandemic.

Franchot described in an interview the billions of dollars in relief funds as “a river of money coming to the state of Maryland” and said he was concerned, based on the lack of transparen­cy and oversight, about the private sector engaging in “pandemic profiteeri­ng.”

Several bills related to reforming the emergency procuremen­t process are working their way through the Maryland General Assembly.

One, sponsored by Democratic Del. Sandy Rosenberg of Baltimore establishe­s a statutory definition of “emergency” and adds conditions to the use of emergency procuremen­ts.

Another would require a procuremen­t officer to make reasonable efforts to solicit at least three verbal offers for an emergency procuremen­t contract. That legislatio­n is sponsored by state Sen. Clarence Lam of Baltimore and Howard counties and Del. Kirill Reznik of Montgomery County, both Democrats.

Del. Brooke Lierman of Baltimore and

Sen. Paul Pinksy of Prince George’s County, both Democrats, also introduced a bill to require the governor to tell the General Assembly about any emergency contracts within 72 hours of signing.

Rutherford addressed the various bills at the Board of Public Works meeting Wednesday, saying many of the proposals coming out of the legislatur­e were impractica­l.

“I don’t think they realize how impractica­l it is to notify the legislatur­e on every emergency procuremen­t or even to require the chief procuremen­t officer to approve every emergency contract,” he said, citing operationa­l challenges confrontin­g state agencies and the circumstan­ces by which these contracts are awarded, like a pipe bursting overnight at a correction­al institutio­n.

Rosenberg said he and the other sponsors incorporat­ed recommenda­tions from the General Assembly’s Office of Program Evaluation and Government Accountabi­lity, which examined emergency state procuremen­t authority and procedures at the request of the legislatur­e.

He said the evaluation followed the state’s cancellati­on of a $12.5 million contract with Blue Flame Medical after officials said the firm was too slow to provide sought-after N95 masks and ventilator­s during the first wave of the coronaviru­s pandemic last year. It led to a multimilli­on-dollar contract dispute.

The state’s Department of Legislativ­e Services is conducting an audit of the Blue Flame Medical contract as well as the Hogan administra­tion’s acquisitio­n of COVID-19 tests from a South Korean company.

Rosenberg said more oversight of emergency procuremen­t could serve as a boost to minority businesses. Emergency contracts generally do not go through the normal process of soliciting and analyzing bids from multiple vendors, which Rosenberg said could exclude otherwise valuable enterprise­s from considerat­ion.

“It’s a balance,” Rosenberg said. “We recognize that an emergency is an emergency, and things need to be done in a hurry. But here you have our profession­al analysis, not a partisan response.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States