Baltimore Sun

Maryland’s bill lifting restrictio­ns on abortions good news for health care

- By Ellen J. MacKenzie and Sarah L. Szanton Ellen J. MacKenzie ( jhsph.deansoffic­e@jhu.edu) is dean of Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Sarah L. Szanton (sondeansof­fice@jhu.edu) is dean of Johns Hopkins School of Nursing.

The Maryland state legislatur­e approved a bill last week that expands insurance coverage of reproducti­ve health care and lifts unnecessar­y restrictio­ns on who can provide abortions. It’s now on the governor’s desk.

This bill is good news — for health. In contrast we have seen abortion restrictio­ns and bans moving through state legislatur­es in Florida, Idaho, South Dakota, Indiana, Wyoming, Arizona and too many other places in recent months. In 2021, for every one provision that would protect or expand access to abortion care, there were 11 that would restrict access or ban it altogether.

Of course, we know what’s behind all this troubling legislatio­n. Our country is waiting on a ruling that could be the most significan­t change to reproducti­ve rights in decades. In the coming months, the U.S. Supreme Court will announce its decision on the constituti­onality of a Mississipp­i law that bans most abortions after 15 weeks, potentiall­y overturnin­g all or part of Roe v. Wade.

Too often this is framed as a political issue. As deans of leading schools of public health and nursing, we care about the outcome because of its importance for health, not politics. Access to the full range of reproducti­ve health services — including abortion — is important to protect the safety of mothers and children, to support families and to advance the health and financial security of communitie­s.

The case before the court, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organizati­on, pits the state of Mississipp­i against the only abortion clinic left in it; all the others have closed, unable to navigate the increasing­ly draconian laws and threats of violence that target abortion providers nationwide.

At Jackson Women’s Health Organizati­on and other clinics around the country, nurses help people who are making exceptiona­lly personal choices. They hear the compelling stories of their patients who seek a better education and better financial stability, who are already mothers and want to focus on the needs of their children, or who feel unprepared to have a child at this point in their lives.

Where abortions are illegal, the consequenc­es for individual­s are significan­t. Research shows that women denied abortions are more likely to endure physical violence from the man involved in the pregnancy. They also have higher levels of debt and experience more bankruptci­es, evictions and other financial hardships.

Reliable access to safe and legal abortion does more than prevent these harms. Many nurses see firsthand how it supports the ability of families to thrive and care for children over the long term. More than half of women who receive an abortion already have children, and many go on to have babies when their families are better able to care for them. Children from intended pregnancie­s are less likely to experience neglect and physical and psychologi­cal aggression from their parents.

On the other hand, keeping women from planning their pregnancie­s can cause irreparabl­e harms. In one study, children born after denial of abortion experience­d five times higher odds of poor maternal bonding compared to children born to women who previously received an abortion and went on to have another pregnancy. Moreover, their siblings have less robust developmen­t and are more likely to live below the federal poverty level.

Access to abortion improves health across the population as well. Public health researcher­s have found, for example, that states with fewer restrictio­ns on reproducti­ve health care have a lower percentage of low-birthweigh­t babies, particular­ly among Black women. Conversely, legislatio­n that restricts abortion based on gestationa­l age, like the Mississipp­i law under review by the Supreme Court, was associated with a 38% increase in maternal mortality. Already, Mississipp­i has the highest infant mortality rates in the U.S. and a maternal mortality ratio nearly twice as high as the U.S. average, with its mortality ratio for Black women nearly three times higher than for white women.

Some may argue that it’s possible to protect families while outlawing abortion. It is telling, however, that as Mississipp­i is moving aggressive­ly to restrict abortion, it is at the bottom of rankings for childhood well-being and often lags in programs to support women and families. In fact, states with extensive abortion restrictio­ns invest the least in the health and well-being of women and children, according to an amicus brief filed by public health scholars, profession­als and organizati­ons on behalf of Jackson Women’s Health.

The overwhelmi­ng likelihood is that overturnin­g Roe v. Wade will undermine health in the U.S. for generation­s to come; very few states are joining Maryland in seeking to protect abortion rights. As many nurses and public health experts recognize, however, access to safe and legal abortion matters in every state. Before discarding decades of legal precedent, the Supreme Court justices should consider the very real consequenc­es for the health and well-being of our nation.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States