Baltimore Sun

Could employee performanc­e evaluation­s have prevented the state’s takeover of Back River?

- By David Plymyer David Plymyer retired as Anne Arundel County Attorney in 2014. His email is dplymyer@comcast.net; Twitter: @dplymyer.

Serious personnel problems within the Baltimore Department of Public Works (DPW) led to the state takeover of the city’s Back River Wastewater Treatment Plant. The Maryland Department of the Environmen­t (MDE) reported that the plant was on the verge of “catastroph­ic failure” when it was inspected on March 23.

One of the likely problems is the haphazard manner in which the city does employee performanc­e evaluation­s. City Chief Administra­tive Officer (CAO) Chris Shorter identified the problem early in his tenure.

The immediate cause of the crisis at the Back River plant was the shortage of DPW employees competent to run it. The city blamed the situation on the lack of “adequate and qualified candidates to replace retiring employees.” A former maintenanc­e supervisor at the plant who was fired last year told the Baltimore Brew that the fault lay with the current head of DPW’s Water and Wastewater Bureau for forcing out knowledgea­ble senior staff.

There may be elements of truth in both accounts, but neither adequately explains the scope of the problems within DPW. The problems are not limited to wastewater treatment, and they long predate the pandemic.

DPW has been in a slow, painful decline for years, leaving city residents plagued by chronic water billing issues, trash accumulati­on in rights of way, and erratic trash and recycling pickup. And those are only the problems that we are aware of.

DPW also is responsibl­e for inspecting undergroun­d pipes and other water, wastewater and stormwater management facilities, and for preparing a long-term plan for repair and replacemen­t. How many other potential catastroph­ic failures are out there?

I don’t know the exact standard for determinin­g whether an office or department of local government is a “failed agency.” I am pretty sure, however, that DPW meets it. And I believe that it is likely that a major deficiency in personnel management identified by Mr. Shorter played a role in DPW’s demise.

The position of CAO was added by voters to the city charter in 2020 to improve day-to-day operations of city government. Shortly after he was hired as Baltimore’s first CAO, Mr. Shorter addressed the fact that the city did not do routine performanc­e evaluation­s of all its employees.

It’s hardly surprising that the shortcomin­g caught his attention. A system of periodic performanc­e evaluation­s for employees, including supervisor­s and managers, is the primary means that almost all large government agencies rely upon to maintain the quality of their workforces.

Mr. Shorter explained at a meeting in July of last year, as reported by The Sun, that only one of the 10 bargaining units representi­ng city employees requires performanc­e evaluation­s. In that unit of 1,200 employees, only 60% were regularly evaluated. Contracts with the other unions, including the city’s largest, don’t require evaluation­s, so it was “not clear” how many of those employees were being evaluated, according to Mr. Shorter.

The city has about 14,000 employees. Mr. Shorter said his goal was to have 50% of the city workforce evaluated within the year. I suggest that he also take a look at why the employee evaluation process is “completely separate” from the promotion process, as described at the meeting.

The mayor’s chief of staff, Michael Huber, a longtime city employee, stated that the evaluation process was “extremely burdensome” and caused “resentment” among employees. Suffice it to say that the fact that performanc­e evaluation­s are time-consuming and not always appreciate­d by employees does not make them any less essential.

Mr. Shorter described his plan to establish a comprehens­ive system of employee performanc­e evaluation­s as a “culture shift.” The culture that he was referring to is the city’s questionab­le commitment to accountabi­lity. Accountabi­lity includes making sure that employees not satisfacto­rily performing their jobs are terminated.

Would an effective performanc­e evaluation system have made a difference at the Back River plant? Perhaps. MDE reported that only two of the 76 plant operators were fully certified by the state. Certificat­ion requires passing a test on how to inspect, maintain, and repair wastewater treatment plants.

A DPW official told MDE that some employees couldn’t pass the required test and others weren’t motivated to try because there is “no incentive” to do so. Those are the type of issues typically addressed in performanc­e evaluation­s.

Making sure that all city employees undergo regular and properly done performanc­e evaluation­s is critically important. It won’t solve all the problems with DPW or other city agencies, but it’s a step in the right direction.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States