Baltimore Sun

Maryland prisons are in need of an ombudsman

- By Judith Lichtenber­g and Olinda Moyd Judith Lichtenber­g ( jalichtenb­erg@gmail. com) is professor emerita of philosophy at Georgetown University and has taught at Jessup Correction­al Institutio­n since 2016. Olinda Moyd (moydlaw@yahoo.com) directs the Re-E

Maryland prisons are dangerous and unhealthy places, both for staff and for the approximat­ely 15,000 men and women detained behind bars. Now is the time for Maryland to step up to the plate and alter the culture so those who live in prison and who work there can do so in an environmen­t conducive to rehabilita­tion and successful reentry.

Incarcerat­ed people are often subjected to acts of violence and other abuse, sometimes by staff. They often have trouble obtaining adequate medical care for serious health needs; practicing their faith; receiving mail related to their incarcerat­ion, as well as other correspond­ence; and accessing reading materials, including legal research documents. Programs for rehabilita­tion are frequently difficult to access, if they exist at all.

Family members regularly face obstacles in visiting their loved ones, and scheduled visits are often abruptly canceled even after families confirm them and have traveled many miles to faraway facilities. Both incarcerat­ed people and staff may face retaliatio­n for reporting acts of misconduct, which can then become widespread and entrenched. Prisoners often face retaliatio­n if they seek redress for their grievances.

Beyond these grave wrongs, there are plenty of mundane but neverthele­ss significan­t problems, like the poor quality of the food prisoners are served, the often unsanitary and repugnant conditions in the kitchens, and the exorbitant prices in the commissary — frequently the only option for individual­s who need to supplement the food the prison provides (almost everyone). Correction­al administra­tions are notoriousl­y defensive and closed to outside review. Between 2008 and 2019, Maryland’s state correction­al institutio­ns endured at least six major criminal scandals. In 2020, three correction­al officers in Maryland were indicted after an investigat­ion revealed ongoing smuggling of drugs, cellphones and other contraband into the Chesapeake Detention Facility in Baltimore. There have been countless assault cases. In March 2021 three correction­al officers in Maryland were indicted on assault and misconduct charges after placing a prisoner in an illegal chokehold.

What is needed is a completely independen­t oversight mechanism for Maryland’s correction­al system. Approximat­ely 18 states are reported to have various entities overseeing prisons. Maryland’s General Assembly is currently considerin­g bills (House Bill 64, Senate Bill 87) to establish a correction­al ombudsman; the Senate bill has bipartisan sponsorshi­p.

The Office of the Correction­al Ombudsman (OCO) would be an independen­t, impartial public office — not part of the Department of Public Safety and Correction­al Services — serving Maryland by promoting positive changes in correction­s. A 2022 poll sponsored by Families Against Mandatory Minimums found that 82% of Americans support independen­t prison oversight.

As outlined in the proposed bill, the OCO would have the authority to enter any facility, without prior notice or permission, at any time and talk to anyone as needed. This is an essential condition for an effective ombudsman. The office would be responsibl­e for:

Investigat­ing complaints related to an incarcerat­ed person’s health, safety, welfare and legal rights;

Providing informatio­n to incarcerat­ed persons and families regarding self-advocacy;

Identifyin­g and publicizin­g systemic problems;

And monitoring and ensuring compliance of the DPSCS with relevant statutes, rules and policies regarding the treatment of incarcerat­ed persons under its jurisdicti­on.

Correspond­ence and communicat­ion with the OCO would be confidenti­al and privileged; penalties could be imposed if agencies or individual­s interfere with the work of the ombudsman office.

Incarcerat­ed people, volunteers, family members and staff all want safe, well-run institutio­ns. Correction­al management is interested in improving the quality of its prisons and jails, reducing deaths, injuries, illness, workplace grievances and lawsuits. That incarcerat­ed people want and need better treatment goes without saying.

Independen­t oversight of Maryland’s prisons and jails would move us a few steps closer to creating a just and decent correction­s environmen­t. The bills to establish an Office of the Correction­al Ombudsman in Maryland deserve our strong support. Now is the time to shine a light on what goes on behind the prison walls.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States