Baltimore Sun

Marylander­s should be wary of contaminat­ed fish

- — Michael Ichniowski, Luthervill­e The writer is a board member of the Maryland Pesticide Education Network.

It was very concerning to read the latest warnings about fish contaminat­ed by per- and polyfluoro­alkyl substances (PFAS) in Maryland’s rivers and streams (“Maryland issues new advisories for fish contaminat­ed with PFAS; crabs and oysters given all-clear,” Dec. 8).

I commend the Maryland Department of the Environmen­t for prioritizi­ng consumer safety.

However, it is past time to ban these “forever chemicals” that threaten the health of Maryland consumers. It’s important to note that these MDE advisories only report on perfluoroo­ctane sulfonate or PFOS.

Though PFOS has not been produced since 2002, its presence at levels of concern over two decades later is cause for alarm.

No consumptio­n safety informatio­n is being provided for the many other PFAS chemicals that are currently manufactur­ed and in active use.

This could make these advisories falsely reassuring about the safety of local fish consumptio­n.

A recent study warned that people who eat just one U.S. freshwater fish a year are likely to show a significan­t increase of PFOS in their bloodstrea­m. This is particular­ly concerning for people with lower incomes who rely on the fish they catch for sustenance.

Besides being found in non-stick surfaces, waterproof fabrics and firefighti­ng foam sources mentioned in the article, some of which have been recently banned in Maryland, PFAS are also present in pesticides which are widely used throughout Maryland on farmlands and fields from which runoff flows into rivers and streams.

Of further concern, there is no research to date on the synergisti­c effects of the combinatio­n of PFAS and pesticides, each of which pose serious risks for human health.

MDE’s fish advisories will be an important source of health and safety informatio­n for Marylander’s fishing in local waters, but the list of contaminan­ts needs to be complete and readily accessible.

Informatio­n on all 24 of the PFAS currently being tested for by MDE needs to be added as soon as it is available to give a true picture of the risk of eating locally caught fish. I am hopeful the Maryland General Assembly will take up the issue of PFAS contaminat­ion in 2024 and help make Maryland’s waters and fisheries safe for everyone to enjoy.

Eliminatin­g the sources of this contaminat­ion should be a priority in next year’s session.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States