Baltimore Sun

A right to die?

Maryland bills seek to legalize medical aid in dying for the terminally ill Maryland psychiatri­sts oppose medical-aid-in-dying bill for good reason

- By Carol Vidal Dr. Carol Vidal (carolvidal­22@gmail. com) is the 2023-2024 president of the Maryland Psychiatri­c Society.

This year, the Legislativ­e Action Committee of the Maryland Psychiatri­c Society, an organizati­on that represents physician psychiatri­sts in Maryland (excluding Montgomery and Prince George’s counties), voted to oppose the End-of-Life Option Act (Senate Bill 443/House Bill

403), which has been discussed in the Senate and House this month.

This bill would allow physicians to prescribe lethal drugs to terminally ill and mentally capable adults who request to die. The practice has alternatel­y been known as “physician-assisted suicide,” “medical aid in dying” or “death with dignity.” However, its essence remains: It involves medical profession­als as active agents in the death of patients. The bill, as written, supports a practice that is contrary to the profession­al philosophy of psychiatri­sts, our training and the reasons why we choose this occupation.

In 2020, MPS conducted a survey of our members about the topic of medical assistance in dying. While there was support for a right of terminally ill patients to choose to die in principle, there was considerab­ly less support for any physician role. Most of our members opposed the idea of physicians administer­ing medication­s with that goal. While there is not unanimity, the highest agreement existed for a question stating “a physician who prescribes or administer­s lethal medication should be trained to recognize signs and symptoms of mental illness,” followed closely by “a patient who requests lethal medication should be evaluated by a psychiatri­st.” In other words, the members who responded to the survey mostly supported ensuring that those patients who requested to die were not suffering from depression, a treatable disorder.

Providing a lethal drug to a patient without a proper psychiatri­c evaluation to rule out depression is simply malpractic­e. Our Maryland Psychiatri­c Society colleagues have suggested many amendments to the bill over the years which the supporters of the bill have refused to adopt. The guardrails are essential in a bill that deals with life and death.

The only way to ensure that a patient is not depressed is by conducting a comprehens­ive psychiatri­c evaluation. These evaluation­s are to depression what a blood pressure read is to hypertensi­on. We cannot diagnose without them. The evaluation would also allow a physician to determine if the person is competent to make the decision to die. Competency evaluation­s are the core of a consultant psychiatri­st’s work. For physicians to prescribe, we first need to diagnose. In order to diagnose, and to rule out depression and lack of competency, a psychiatri­c evaluation is warranted.

Supporters of the bill often mention a Medscape 2020 poll completed by 5,000 American physicians that asked if physician-assisted dying should “be made legal for terminally ill patients” to which 55% responded positively. It is important to point out that something can be legal and still require safeguards and that this survey indicated that roughly one out of two physicians disagreed with it being legal.

As physicians and psychiatri­sts, our goal is always to minimize physical and emotional suffering in our patients. Hospice care provides comfort to those suffering from pain in the later stages of a terminal disease.

However, providing a lethal drug to a patient without a proper psychiatri­c evaluation to rule out depression is simply malpractic­e. Our Maryland Psychiatri­c Society colleagues have suggested many amendments to the bill over the years which the supporters of the bill have refused to adopt. The guardrails are essential in a bill that deals with life and death.

The only way to ensure that a patient is not depressed is by conducting a comprehens­ive psychiatri­c evaluation. These evaluation­s are to depression what a blood pressure read is to hypertensi­on. We cannot diagnose without them. The evaluation would also allow a physician to determine if the person is competent to make the decision to die.

 ?? STAFF FILE ?? O. J. Brigance, a former Ravens football player who has the neurodegen­erative disease ALS, waits to testify against a bill to legalize physician-assisted death last year. Seated next to him is a supporter of the bill, Catherine Weber, with Maryland Action Team for Compassion & Choices. New versions of the bill are again before the legislatur­e.
STAFF FILE O. J. Brigance, a former Ravens football player who has the neurodegen­erative disease ALS, waits to testify against a bill to legalize physician-assisted death last year. Seated next to him is a supporter of the bill, Catherine Weber, with Maryland Action Team for Compassion & Choices. New versions of the bill are again before the legislatur­e.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States