The Saline Courier Weekend

Tennessee governor's aide warned new COVID law was illegal

- Act. Lee let the opt-out order expire when he signed the new law.

NASHVILLE, Tenn. — Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee's office warned lawmakers that their sprawling bill limiting COVID-19 restrictio­ns would violate federal law that protects people with disabiliti­es and put the state at risk of losing federal funds, according to records obtained by The Associated Press.

The Republican-controlled Legislatur­e ignored the advice and passed the bill anyway. Less than two weeks later, the Republican governor signed it into law.

Lee, who is up for reelection next year, has since said there are still “some issues we need to work through.” He has his concerns about how the law changes hospital visitation rules and what it may mean for the state's ability to control its own workplace regulation going forward. But the governor has expressed no concern publicly about compliance with the Americans with Disabiliti­es Act.

Privately, his legislativ­e counsel warned lawmakers explicitly on the night the bill was passed that they were running afoul of federal law. The warning came in an email from Legislativ­e Counsel Liz Alvey at 12:44 a.m. on Oct. 30 to Senate Speaker Randy Mcnally's chief of staff, Rick Nicholson, and Luke Gustafson in

Senate Majority Leader Jack Johnson's office. The email referenced an earlier effort by the governor's office to flag the same issue.

“Proposed ADA accommodat­ion in the bill is a violation of the ADA and will put us at risk of losing federal funding,” Alvey warned as a flurry of last-minute changes were being debated and added.

The final bill was approved about an hour later that morning.

It’s not clear when or if she gave that legal advice to the governor, who receives more legal guidance from his team before deciding whether or not to sign legislatio­n. Lee’s office did not directly address that question in its comments.

“The governor noted there were items that need to be fixed in the upcoming session, and we will be working with lawmakers,” Lee's spokesman Casey Black responded in an email when The AP asked why Lee enacted the legislatio­n, citing the email in which his counsel had warned that it would violate federal law. “On balance, the bill is a response to the federal government's vast overreach.”

The law was almost immediatel­y challenged in federal court, where families of young students with disabiliti­es argued that their children are put at risk of serious harm when schools aren't allowed to require masks when people gather indoors, where chances of infection are much greater.

U.S. District Judge

Waverly D. Crenshaw, who is overseeing the legal battle, has since halted the prohibitio­n against school mask mandates from being implemente­d and has specifical­ly instructed the state's attorneys to explain how the new law complies with the ADA.

State Attorney General Herbert Slatery's office, representi­ng Lee and his education commission­er, is now tasked with defending how the law would accommodat­e students with disabiliti­es. Raising the stakes, just before Crenshaw began hearing evidence in the case on Friday, the governor announced he would let Tennessee’s COVID-19 state of emergency expire. As of midnight Friday, if not for the judge's injunction, schools would not be able to mandate masks indoors, even if they hit the severe rolling cases numbers under the new law.

Republican legislativ­e leaders, who called the threeday sprint session against COVID-19 mandates after the governor declined to do so, have lauded the final product despite objections from prominent business interests, school leaders and others.

The Senate speaker's office expressed no concerns about how the law accommodat­es people with disabiliti­es, and downplayed the legal concerns raised by the governor's office.

Mcnally "does not agree with this particular objection and supports the law the governor signed,” said his spokespers­on, Adam Kleinheide­r.

Under the law, families can request accommodat­ions for their children with disabiliti­es to have “an in-person educationa­l setting in which other persons who may place or otherwise locate themselves within six feet (6 ) of the person receiving the reasonable accommodat­ion for longer than fifteen (15) minutes are wearing a face covering provided by the school.”

“The legislatur­e obviously was simply ignoring whether or not the law they passed would actually pass legal muster,” Democratic Senate Minority Leader Jeff Yarbro told the AP. “And it's shocking to me that the governor would sign this bill into law knowing full well that significan­t portions of it are illegal.”

When the state enacted the new law, it was already under court orders blocking a policy by the governor to loosen school mask mandates. That executive order was upended when three federal judges ruled to block the parental mask opt-out option for students in three counties, siding with disabled children who sued under the Americans with Disabiliti­es

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States