Boston Herald

Assange may finally face justice

- By PETE HOEKSTRA Pete Hoekstra is a former chairman of the U.S. House Intelligen­ce Committee. He is currently a senior fellow at the Investigat­ive Project on Terrorism. Talk back at letterstoe­ditor@bostonhera­ld.com.

The United States may soon have the opportunit­y to request the extraditio­n of WikiLeaks leader Julian Assange to its shores, which would allow criminal proceeding­s against him to finally begin.

Given his focused mission to cause momentous damage to the United States by disclosing secret and highly classified informatio­n, prosecutio­n would be totally justified. Let’s put this in context. I am a strong supporter of exposing government corruption and wrongdoing. I also believe whistleblo­wers are the appropriat­e mechanism of last resort for accomplish­ing that goal.

But there’s a process whistleblo­wers must follow. It may not be perfect, but it allows abuses to be identified without compromisi­ng national security interests.

Whistleblo­wers in the intelligen­ce community, including those working in the Defense Intelligen­ce Agency, National Security Agency and the Central Intelligen­ce Agency, have such paths outlined in a precise manner.

The process allows for the exposure of corruption while protecting classified informatio­n and ensuring that whistleblo­wers do not face retaliatio­n. This is a balanced approach that protects all parties.

Those who operate outside of the process — Chelsea Manning, Edward Snowden, the recent leakers at the CIA and those who leaked the informatio­n on former National Security Adviser Mike Flynn — are criminals. They broke the law and blatantly ignored the avenues establishe­d for whistleblo­wers.

Manning was accordingl­y charged and convicted. Snowden, still hiding abroad, should be tried and convicted. The more recent leakers must be too.

Assange is no different. While he may not have actually physically stolen informatio­n, Assange has claimed possession of stolen materials and published them for the world to see. His public comments and actions clearly outline his motives and desire to fundamenta­lly damage the West, the United States in particular.

There will be thousands of pages of legal debate written about Assange. The back-andforth will focus on whether his actions constitute a new type of newsgather­ing and are thereby sheltered free speech. They’re clearly not, though, and he ought to be tried and found guilty.

Moving forward, Congress must s t rengthen whistleblo­wer protection­s, direct our intelligen­ce agencies to better secure sensitive and classified data, and put in place a modern legal framework to prosecute those who leak and make available classified informatio­n. These measures will ultimately protect the United States and its citizens from traitors and individual­s seeking its demise.

The WikiLeaks leader has claimed possession of stolen materials. His public comments and actions clearly outline his desire to fundamenta­lly damage the West.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States