Boston Herald

Trump blunders through Europe

- By LEONID BERSHIDSKY Leonid Bershidsky is a Bloomberg View columnist. Talk back at letterstoe­ditor@ bostonhera­ld.com.

During his first foreign trip since he was elected, President Trump didn’t look too out of place in Saudi Arabia or even in the Vatican. In Brussels, however, he was a befuddled elephant in a china shop, doing his best to convince European leaders that the U.S. was clueless on key cooperatio­n issues.

It was bad enough that he shoved aside Montenegro Prime Minister Dusko Markovic to be in the front row during a North Atlantic Trade Organizati­on photo opportunit­y; Markovic, whose country has just been welcomed into NATO, graciously said that the U.S. president belonged out front. It was awful enough that he used a memorial opening ceremony to make a politicall­y contentiou­s speech in which he railed against NATO members’ low defense spending and, unlike any of his predecesso­rs, avoided explicitly affirming NATO’s pledge of mutual defense — the very Article 5 of the treaty that the memorial was supposed to commemorat­e.

One would expect a novice political leader in his first six months since being elected to climb a steep learning curve; instead Trump appeared to demonstrat­e a persistent learning disability. Despite having been told repeatedly that NATO member states had pledged to spend 2 percent of economic output on defense individual­ly, not to pay that amount into some common pool, Trump repeated the canard that underspend­ers “owe massive amounts of money from past years and not paying in those past years.” There appears to be no way to explain to him that no NATO member is in arrears to the military bloc’s budget.

“I never once asked what the new NATO Headquarte­rs cost,” Trump said. “I refuse to do that.” The number is published on NATO’s website: 1.12 billion euros ($1.26 billion), an amount comparable with NATO’s common budget for 2017 (1.5 billion euros) but contribute­d separately by the member states in proportion to the size of their economies. Besides that, each country paid for the offices to be occupied by its mission.

At the meeting with top EU officials, Trump tore into Germany’s trade surplus, showing a similar disregard for facts. “The Germans are bad, very bad,” he said, according to Der Spiegel. “Look at the millions of cars they sell in the U.S. Horrible. We’re going to stop that.”

German carmakers don’t sell millions of cars in the U.S. Last year, the total unit sales of Volkswagen, BMW and Daimler reached 139,396 (not counting Lamborghin­is). At the same time, the German companies produce far more vehicles in the U.S. For example, BMW made 32,659 sport utility vehicles in Spartanbur­g, S.C., in April 2017; it churns out 1,400 a day, most of them for export. The relatively few BMW X5s on German roads are made in Spartanbur­g too: It makes sense for BMW to make the large cars closer to their main market.

Daimler made a total of 300,000 Mercedes cars in Tuscaloosa, Ala., in 2016. The plant is the state’s biggest exporter. VW’s Chattanoog­a, Tenn., operation has a 150,000-vehicle production capacity and also is export-oriented.

If Trump is intent on making sure Americans buy more U.S.-made cars, he should be the biggest lobbyist for German car manufactur­ers. They bring jobs to the U.S. and work to reduce the country’s trade deficit. The stocks of all three major carmakers fell following Trump’s remark — but the drops weren’t dramatic. Investors may be betting that someone will give Trump better informatio­n and he’ll change his tune. As his NATO “debts” comments show, that is unlikely.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States