Boston Herald

Win for 1st Amendment

-

An Asian-American rock group with an edgy name can now trademark that name thanks to the U.S. Supreme Court, which struck a blow for the First Amendment and against federal bureaucrat­s consumed by political correctnes­s.

In an 8-0 ruling this week, the high court found that the “disparagem­ent clause” used by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to deny trademark protection for the Oregon-based band The Slants is quite simply unconstitu­tional.

The band, of course, can call itself anything it wants, but without trademark protection couldn’t safeguard its rights for, say, T-shirts or other items after the patent office found the name offensive. They’ve been fighting this lunatic ruling since 2011

Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the court, found, “The clause reaches any trademark that disparages any person, group, or institutio­n. It applies to trademarks like the following: ‘Down with racists,’ ‘ Down with sexists,’ ‘ Down with homophobes.’ It is not an anti-discrimina­tion clause; it is a happy-talk clause. In this way, it goes much further than is necessary to serve the interest asserted.”

Don’t you wonder if those ubiquitous “Yankees Suck” Tshirts were ever covered?

Alito also noted, “It offends a bedrock First Amendment principle: Speech may not be banned on the grounds that it expresses ideas that offend.”

Also cheering the ruling were the Washington Redskins, whose appeal of a similar 2014 ruling has been awaiting action on this case.

Redskins owner Dan Snyder has insisted the team name “represents honor, respect and pride” for Native Americans. Those who disagree are free to not buy tickets or T-shirts and to exercise their own First Amendment rights. They just can’t have overreachi­ng government bureaucrat­s fighting their battles for them.

“Speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability, or any other similar grounds is hateful,” Alito wrote, “but the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprude­nce is that we protect the freedom to express the thought we hate.”

And thank goodness for that!

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States