Boston Herald

Trump inspires little love, no fear

Shortcomin­gs undermine GOP’s legislativ­e agenda

- By DOYLE McMANUS Doyle McManus is a columnist for the Los Angeles Times. Talk back at letterstoe­ditor@ bostonhera­ld.com.

Niccolo Machiavell­i wrote that a ruler should seek to be both loved and feared — but if a prince must choose one, he should opt for fear. President Trump has managed the opposite: Among Republican­s in Congress, he is neither loved nor feared. Instead, at least when it comes to legislatio­n, he’s made himself almost irrelevant.

Last week, Trump called GOP holdouts to the White House to demand their support for their party’s health care bill, a traditiona­l exercise of presidenti­al muscle. None of them switched sides; they saw nothing to be afraid of.

Before that, a pro-Trump group announced it would run attack ads against Dean Heller, a GOP senator from Nevada who had the temerity to denounce the Trumpcare bill’s deep cuts in Medicaid. The Senate Republican leader, Mitch McConnell, told Trump to stop the negative campaign. Heller was afraid of Nevada voters, not the White House.

When a similar bill was in trouble in the House, Trump warned conservati­ve hardliners that they’d lose their seats if they didn’t vote yes. They ignored the threat, voted no — and Trump promptly caved, supporting the changes they sought.

No Republican dissident has been punished for straying from the White House. If anything, they’ve been rewarded.

So much for fear. What about love?

Since he came to the White House, Trump hasn’t enlarged the number of voters who support him; he’s reduced it. His job approval rating has slumped to about 40 percent and stayed there.

He’s still backed by more than 80 percent of Republican­s, and that should count for something. But he hasn’t even mobilized his own base to help the health care bill.

The president is often described as a “master salesman,” but he’s not using his talents much. He’s given no Oval Office speech telling Americans why they should embrace this health care bill, made no presidenti­al tour to tout its advantages.

Trump hasn’t done much to build amicable bonds of loyalty with GOP members of Congress, either.

In a recent television interview, Trump criticized the House bill he had earlier praised, calling it “mean.” The message to members of Congress was jarring: I want you to cast a vote that could risk your career, but don’t expect me to protect you from the consequenc­es.

And on Friday, Trump undercut his chief negotiator, McConnell, by suggesting it might be time to throw in the towel.

“If Republican Senators are unable to pass what they are working on now, they should immediatel­y REPEAL, and then REPLACE at a later date!” he tweeted in apparent frustratio­n.

That’s exactly what conservati­ve holdouts would like — but it wasn’t the solution McConnell was laboring for.

Part of the problem is that Trump often appears unaware of the content of his own party’s legislatio­n. That makes it harder for him to be an effective salesman, in public or in private. When he does talk about the legislatio­n, he describes it breezily as “great health care,” providing better insurance at a lower price. That’s a promise the bill, with its massive spending cuts, can’t possibly keep.

There’s more at stake here than this month’s version of a Republican health care bill.

Trump’s scattersho­t approach, his chaotic management style, his inattentio­n to detail, his failure to bring GOP dissidents into line and his sagging popularity are all making it harder for Republican­s to enact their entire legislativ­e agenda.

“The central challenge for Republican­s is how to make it clear that they are focused on the No. 1 issue — the economy, jobs and incomes,” David Winston, a GOP strategist who has advised congressio­nal leaders, told me last week. “They’re spending a lot of time talking about other things.”

Including tweets? “Including tweets,” he acknowledg­ed.

Five centuries ago, Machiavell­i concluded that what a ruler needs most is a quality he called, in Italian, “virtú.” The word doesn’t mean “virtue” in our moralistic sense. Instead, it means something more like “prowess,” a combinatio­n of boldness and skill.

Trump clearly owns the first half of that equation, boldness. But he has shown little skill. If he’s ever read Machiavell­i — an unlikely propositio­n, to be sure — it doesn’t show. He’s neither feared nor loved. As a result, whether he realizes it, his power as president is already eroding.

 ??  ?? TRUMP: Lacks the skills Machiavell­i saw as vital for an effective ruler.
TRUMP: Lacks the skills Machiavell­i saw as vital for an effective ruler.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States