Boston Herald

Trump trashes transgende­r service

Military ban may begin erosion of LGBT rights

- By D.A. STEWARD D.A. Steward is a civil rights activist and LGBTQ health advocate in Boston.

The internet was abuzz this week after President Trump tweeted the announceme­nt of a ban on transgende­r people serving in the American armed forces. Pundits and social media pontificat­ors alike — from conservati­ve to neo-liberal Democrat to anti-nationalis­t — were aghast at such a bold and seemingly matter-of-fact move by the president. (He quickly moved on to his usual business of bashing Attorney General Jeff Sessions and his former rival in last year’s election, Hillary Clinton.)

“After consultati­on with my Generals and military experts, please be advised that the United States Government will not accept or allow transgende­r individual­s to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military,” he posted in a series of three tweets Wednesday morning. “Our military must be focused on decisive and overwhelmi­ng victory and cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgende­r in the military would entail. Thank you.”

There was, understand­ably, a considerab­le outcry that followed, with hashtags including #Trans-RightsAreH­umanRights, # TransPeopl­eAreNotA-Burden and #NoTransBan immediatel­y trending on social media. However, the discourse quickly shifted to the real life implicatio­ns of the president’s statement, and many pointed to the lengthy process that was required for former President Bill Clinton to institute the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy in the 1990s.

It’s true that there has been considerab­le pushback to Trump’s announceme­nt from members of Congress, and it’s unclear how such a ban would be implemente­d. But we need to take a moment and recognize how damaging the rhetoric is. The start of any widespread civil rights violations ultimately began with rhetoric and destructiv­e propaganda targeted toward a particular community.

During early colonialis­m, rampant propaganda, fueled by religion, spread through the minds of Europeans that the occupation of Africa was necessary to tame a barbaric people and save them from themselves. Such rhetoric would ultimately lead to the destructio­n of entire civilizati­ons and eventually to the trans-Atlantic slave trade.

Before Japanese immigrants were inhumanely rounded up in internment camps during World War II, the country was gripped by irrational, xenophobic fear following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. Hateful, unsubstant­iated rhetoric helped lead President Franklin Roosevelt to issue an executive order authorizin­g the detention and relocation of nearly 120,000 people, more than 60 percent of whom were already American citizens.

The Trump administra­tion and its supporters have establishe­d a dangerous slippery slope, one that could theoretica­lly lead to the reinstatem­ent of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell; the eventual reversal of the Supreme Court decision recognizin­g legal marriage between same-sex couples; a pushback of the executive order that allows LGBTQ-identified couples to visit each other in the hospital without the permission of a family member; the stripping of current government health care subsidies and laws requiring coverage of transgende­r health services; and the abolishmen­t of current protection­s of LGBTQ minors against mentally damaging conversion therapy.

And that could just be the beginning.

President Trump’s trans ban on military service may not ever come to full fruition, but a nation openly contesting the rights of a minority has proven time and time again to reap centuries-long consequenc­es on entire population­s — in this case, for that of a young person who is questionin­g or just coming to grips with their transgende­r identity. The backlash of a nation grappling with the worth of your existence is a weight many cannot bear.

If we believe today that it is safer to take away someone’s right to travel based on their religious beliefs, or that withholdin­g an individual’s right to serve in the military saves us from a financial burden, then tomorrow we will fall for far more dangerous civil rights abuses until we find ourselves — much like the interned Japanese, and African ancestors, and the many other communitie­s that have suffered brutal oppression before us — wondering how it got this far.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States