Boston Herald

Kelly eyes ‘forgotten’ Afghan war

Mission hazy even as Russia, Iran strengthen Taliban

- By MARKOS KOUNALAKIS Markos Kounalakis is a senior fellow at Central European University and visiting fellow at the Hoover Institutio­n. Talk back at letterstoe­ditor@ bostonhera­ld.com.

Americans may have lost sight of the Afghan war, but Donald Trump’s new chief of staff, Gen. John F. Kelly, has not. He sacrificed his son to that war. He knows that what happens in Afghanista­n does not stay in Afghanista­n. Now, if he can focus West Wing minds, he may bring Afghanista­n back to the public consciousn­ess, where it belongs.

Americans pay more attention to fantasy sports, Instagram feeds and “Keeping Up with the Kardashian­s” than they do to the longest war in America’s history. If there is collective attention deficit disorder, it’s understand­able. The war is white noise.

War reporters call kinetic action “boom-boom.” Exploding stuff makes good pictures and gets attention. But nearly 16 years of boomboom has dulled Americans’ senses, and their outrage. Years of fighting to turn out the Taliban evolved into nation building, troop surges and active counterins­urgency and then morphed into rounds of presidenti­ally ordered redeployme­nts and more training of Afghan forces before creeping, finally, into the supposedly narrow counterter­rorism mission that falls short of the withdrawal politician­s every election cycle say they support.

Clearly, something happened along the way.

Boom-boom from the Afghan provinces is no longer a daily American popular concern. It is just a costly and disastrous daily reality. Iranians and Russians are bogging down American efforts, strengthen­ing the Taliban’s material abilities and resolve, and doing to the United States what it did to the Soviets in the 1980s during the last big bloodletti­ng. Afghanista­n’s boom-boom is background to the amplified daily White House dissonance. In June, Defense Secretary James Mattis told the Senate Armed Services Committee that America is “not winning in Afghanista­n right now.”

That’s not to say the strategy isn’t being reviewed or the military isn’t adjusting and putting pressure and preparing Afghan forces to lead the fight — of course it is. The U.S. military is a learning organizati­on that adapts to the facts on the ground and takes both force protection and its mission deadly seriously. Publicly, however, America has lost interest and perspectiv­e on the greatest drain on its resources and strength in a generation. Candidate Donald Trump said Middle East wars had cost $6 trillion. The financial cost is one thing. The human cost is incalculab­le. Kelly knows this from his Afghan command and his personal loss — one of his Marine sons, 1st Lt. Robert Kelly, stepped on a landmine while leading his platoon in 2010. Longterm war costs are always high. In Afghanista­n, they are exorbitant. The cheap, quick and dirty Taliban overthrow at the end of 2001, however, cost America in other ways. The snap toppling of the Kabul Taliban leadership led to the hubris and overconfid­ence that America was on a roll. That the nation could use the victorious momentum to completely and independen­tly change the face of the region before it fully completed the multinatio­nal job at hand in Afghanista­n. America and its allies got distracted in Iraq, losing focus on this backward place with barebones sovereign state legitimacy. Afghanista­n remains a jumble of tribes and a mix of disjointed topographi­es cobbled together and called a country.

Its geographic location is what makes it important. Its recent history is what makes it a threat. It remains one big breeding ground for an antiAmeric­an insurgency fed by a duplicitou­s Pakistan sympatheti­c and supportive of guerilla warriors. Even the Islamic State has now found a welcoming and fertile new breeding ground in and around Afghanista­n. Russians and Iranians look at nearby Afghanista­n and see the perfect place for payback and mischief against a faraway and politicall­y aloof America.

Why do the United States and its allies stay in? It is a sincere question. The odds are tough, the conditions worse. What is required, not just for Congress, the military, and the American people is a clear and concise goal: What are U.S. troops supposed to be doing in Afghanista­n? The mission needs to be defined and articulate­d for everyone.

Kelly’s discipline, clarity, and focus are legend. Kabul, Kandahar, Helmand, Nangarhar, Logar — they are faintly familiar to a tired and distracted American public. Those Afghan provinces, however, reside deep in Kelly’s sinews and soul. Bringing a flailing West Wing back to basics and to defining the Afghan mission could bring America’s attention back to an otherwise forgotten war. “Winning,” however, is something altogether different.

 ??  ?? KELLY: Knows the human cost of the war, which took the life of his son.
KELLY: Knows the human cost of the war, which took the life of his son.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States