Boston Herald

Dental chief pans expanding non-dentist role

- Massachuse­tts Dental Society President Dr. David Lustbader joined Boston Herald Radio’s “Morning Meeting” program yesterday to talk about two bills being debated on Beacon Hill that would have a sweeping impact on Bay State dentists.

Q: What is the logic behind the bill that could create an environmen­t where someone who isn’t a full-blown dentist could be filling cavities? What are your concerns?

A: It’s hard to define the logic, quite frankly. But I guess the initial impetus was under the guise of increasing access to care.

Q: But wouldn’t that also potentiall­y decrease the quality of care?

A: Potentiall­y. Very much so.

Q: Wouldn’t we potentiall­y see more mistakes from people who don’t have the proper training?

A: That’s correct. This bill not only includes restoratio­ns, it also includes extracting teeth basically unsupervis­ed.

General supervisio­n is a nebulous term, it can encompass as far as 150 or 200 miles away, which really doesn’t do the patient much good.

Q: The other side, they might argue that when it comes to doctors and aides and this new class of dental profession­als, “these people do almost everything anyway. Why shouldn’t they be able to do this?”

A: If you look at the medical model as an example ... physician assistants and nurse practition­ers do exist on the medical side, they work under direct supervisio­n, they are not performing surgery, they are assisting and they’re there essentiall­y to assist.

They can’t expand care, they can do preventati­ve care and all those things are probably good ideas to expand to the dental side. But to do irreversib­le procedures with indirect supervisio­n, to me, could potentiall­y be extremely reckless, could be dangerous, could set up a second class of care for poorer individual­s — which I don’t think anyone wants to see happen.

Q: When it comes to extracting a tooth and the nerves and everything that’s involved, if things go wrong, could that be deadly?

A: Yes. It takes 14 years to become an oral and maxillofac­ial surgeon. Under this bill, after three years post high school, you would potentiall­y be able to take out teeth.

Q: How much training would be required?

A: Under this bill, it’s three years post high school. So under our bill, which I believe is a better model, it would be four years of college plus two years of a master’s degree, which is analogous to what a nurse practition­er does.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States