Gitmo groin searches irk 9/11 plotters
Captives allege sex harassment
GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba — The top accused 9/11 plotters claimed in court yesterday that guards’ “groin searches” amount to sexual harassment.
“We be under sexual harassment today for search in being here,” Khalid Sheikh Mohammed announced in broken English in court. The judge, Army Col. James Pohl, was asking the accused mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks whether he understood he could voluntarily waive attendance for the rest of this seven-day court session of pretrial hearings.
One by one, the other four alleged plotters echoed Mohammed’s complaints. Alleged plot deputy Ramzi bin al Shibh called it a “sexual harassment search,” and alleged co-conspirator Mustafa al Hawsawi announced he wanted to leave the court immediately, voluntarily. Pohl recessed so guards could remove the Saudi who suffered rectal damage under CIA custody, along with the pillow he sits on during hearings.
Case prosecutor Bob Swann told the judge that the prison had chosen that day to implement an approved Standard Operating Procedure that permits physical groin searches; the military had in the past used metal detectors and other electronic devices to see whether Camp 7’s high-value detainees had something hidden in their genital areas.
Pohl ordered the prison to bring a witness to explain the change in practice, perhaps as early as tomorrow. Left unclear was whether the testimony would be heard in open court.
The five men are accused of directing or helping the 19 hijackers who crashed four commercial airliners in New York, at the Pentagon and in a Pennsylvania field on Sept. 11, 2001, killing 2,976 people. They were arraigned in May 2012 and the court has been holding periodic pretrial hearings ever since.
Guantanamo’s former CIA captives, held in a secret lockup called Camp 7, have access to certain free satellite news networks, for example Russia’s RT and Iran’s Press TV channels, and would therefore be well aware of the ongoing sexual harassment controversy in the United States.
But the groin search issue is not new. At times, it has been litigated in federal court among the general population prisoners, with low-value captives complaining through their lawyers that the physical handling of their genitals was a violation of their Muslim faith.