Boston Herald

Falling short of the task

-

Lost in the holiday madness and President Trump’s incessant news-making of late was a report from a Beacon Hill task force charged with examining the state’s public records law, specifical­ly as it relates to police records. The group didn’t reach consensus on legislatio­n, instead merely highlighti­ng “areas of concern” that will be sure to disappear into the ether now that it has concluded its assignment.

That result shouldn’t come as much of a surprise.

During a 2016 debate over updates to the state’s public records law, Beacon Hill chose not to deal with some of the thorniest issues —including whether the Legislatur­e and the governor’s office should be exempt from the law, or whether there is a public interest in making more police records available for public inspection.

So they kicked the can down the road, appointing task forces to study those issues. After failing to meet for 18 months, the one set up to address the legislativ­e exemption bought itself another year to report. The one that addressed police records filed its report on time — but took its cue from the Legislatur­e by kicking its own can down the road.

“While the group could not reach consensus on proposed legislatio­n, it highlighte­d areas of concern in current statutes and recommende­d further examinatio­n of these laws,” the chair wrote in the report. “Further examinatio­n.” Well, that sounds like a job for another task force!

The group failed to reach consensus on whether domestic violence arrests should be a matter of public record; a 2014 law largely shielded them from public view. Members couldn’t even agree on whether the state police should be required to compile a daily arrest log open to public scrutiny — a requiremen­t for all municipal police department­s.

It’s hard to blame the task force itself; as these things usually are it was set up for failure. No, the issue is with a Legislatur­e that is willing to outsource the tough issues, with reliably unsatisfyi­ng results.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States