Boston Herald

Some coastal states fight drilling plans

-

ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. — Some coastal states opposed to President Trump’s plan to allow oil and gas drilling off most of the nation’s coastline are fighting back with proposed state laws designed to thwart the proposal.

The drilling Trump proposes would take place in federal waters offshore in an area called the Outer Continenta­l Shelf. But states control the 3 miles of ocean closest to shore and are proposing laws designed to make it difficult, or impossible, to bring the oil or gas ashore in their areas.

States including New Jersey, New York, California, South Carolina and Rhode Island have introduced bills prohibitin­g any infrastruc­ture related to offshore oil or gas production from being built in or crossing their state waters. Washington state is threatenin­g such a bill. Maryland has introduced a bill imposing strict liability on anyone who causes a spill while engaged in offshore drilling or oil or gas extraction.

“We started thinking about how we control the first 3 miles of ocean, and there are state rights that we have,” said New Jersey state Sen. Jeff Van Drew, a Democrat who represents the state’s southern coast. “Even if we don’t succeed in banning it outright, we can still make it a lot more expensive to do it in this area. It’s a back-door, ingenious way to block this.”

California Democratic state Sen. Hannah-Beth Jackson said a ban on pipelines and docks could force the industry to rely on ships that would then have to sail to the waters of a different state to bring their cargo ashore. “What we can do is make drilling for offshore oil and gas so prohibitiv­ely expensive that it won’t pencil out,” she said.

In 1985, voters in Santa Cruz, Calif., required that any zoning changes to accommodat­e onshore facilities for offshore oil exploratio­n or production must be approved by a vote of the electorate, one of 26 similar ordinances that were adopted in California. An oil and gas industry associatio­n unsuccessf­ully sued 13 of the communitie­s, claiming they were interferin­g with lawful interstate commerce.

Andy Radford, a senior policy adviser with the American Petroleum Institute, said it has been 30 years since the last detailed analysis of potential offshore oil and gas supplies. He said states ought to welcome offshore drilling for the revenue it can produce for them. Offshore energy production in the Atlantic Ocean alone could support 265,000 jobs and generate $22 billion a year within 20 years, he said.

“We should take that step forward to advance our energy future,” he said. “Local communitie­s and workers benefit from energy exploratio­n and production, in addition to these investment­s generating significan­t state revenues to fund schools, hospitals and other public services.”

Connie Gillette, a spokeswoma­n for the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, said “the laws, goals, and policies” of a state adjacent to the Outer Continenta­l Shelf are among the factors the federal government must consider in approving oil and gas leases.

 ?? AP FILE PHOTO ?? FUELED UP: People protest President Trump’s plan to allow offshore oil and gas drilling along most of the nation’s coastline.
AP FILE PHOTO FUELED UP: People protest President Trump’s plan to allow offshore oil and gas drilling along most of the nation’s coastline.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States