Boston Herald

Media ignores Mueller overreach

- By L. BRENT BOZELL III L. Brent Bozell III is the president of the Media Research Center.

The television networks have flooded us with hours and hours of coverage of the Robert Mueller probe as they continue to look under every rock for some sign of Russian collusion with the Trump campaign. But on May 4, a federal judge harshly blasted Mueller’s tactics in court, even going as far as challengin­g the scope of his authority in this probe.

Was this a big story for our objective press? No. NBC and CBS gave it 30 seconds of airtime combined. ABC devoted two minutes to it, and that was that.

A new Media Research Center study shows that in the first four months of 2018, these three networks have aired 321 minutes of evening-news coverage of the Russia investigat­ion, and the tone toward President Trump was 98 percent negative. When you’re this close to being perfectly negative, why wreck the trend?

At least The Washington Post put the judge’s bombshell rebuke on the front page Saturday. The New York Times buried it on the bottom of page A13, below other Trump-scandal stories.

On the taxpayer-subsidized airwaves, “PBS NewsHour” offered nothing.

This was a test for the Muellerobs­essed media — and they flunked. They are thoroughly invested in how Mueller’s team could help them damage, or even end, the Trump presidency. Apparently, they’re not alone.

“You don’t really care about Mr. Manafort’s bank fraud,” federal Judge T.S. Ellis III scolded Mueller’s team during a court hearing in Alexandria, Va. “You really care about getting informatio­n Mr. Manafort can give you that would reflect on Mr. Trump and lead to his prosecutio­n or impeachmen­t or whatever.”

He added: “I don’t see what relation this indictment has with anything the special counsel is authorized to investigat­e . ... What we don’t want in this country is we don’t want anyone with unfettered power.”

It can’t get much tougher than that.

Mueller would appear to have unfettered power over the networks, too. While they have used the Russia investigat­ion to bury Trump in negative evaluation­s, they haven’t shown any interest in transparen­cy for Mueller and his supervisor, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. Judge Ellis and House Republican­s have demanded that Mueller fully disclose the (heavily redacted) contents of the instructio­ns Rosenstein gave him on the scope of his investigat­ion.

On Jan. 3, when Manafort’s lawyers challenged Mueller’s investigat­ion as being too broad, ABC gave it 51 seconds; NBC gave it 30 seconds; and CBS gave it 13 seconds. Add that up and so far this year, by our count, the networks have devoted roughly four minutes to serious allegation­s of Mueller’s overreach with a team of investigat­ors that clearly believes it has the power to delve into anyone’s private life if it will harm the president.

That’s sure not how these transparen­tly liberal networks treated Kenneth Starr when he threatened Bill Clinton’s presidency. Back then, the Center for Media and Public Affairs found that from July through September 1998, Starr’s network evening news evaluation­s were 15 percent positive and 85 percent negative. In the same time frame, Clinton received 37 percent positive coverage — while he was being impeached!

Liberals pretend that criticizin­g or questionin­g Mueller reeks of obstructio­n of justice, but the public isn’t buying this nonsense. The Media Research Center has documented that from January to April there was another long stretch of 90 percent negative Trump coverage on the evening news. Yet Trump’s approval ratings went up.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States