Boston Herald

Saving lives should be bipartisan issue

- By MARC A. THIESSEN Marc A. Thiessen is a syndicated columnist.

WASHINGTON — Imagine the horror of learning you have a terminal illness for which science has not yet come up with a treatment. Now imagine receiving the same diagnosis, and then learning a promising new treatment exists that could save your life — but you can’t get access to it thanks to government­al obstacles.

That is the nightmare that befell Andrea Sloan, an Austin, Texas, lobbyist who gave up her job at a highpriced law firm to advocate for victims of domestic violence.

In 2007, Sloan was diagnosed with ovarian cancer, and for more than six years tried every Food and Drug Administra­tion-approved treatment for her disease. All failed. With Sloan’s health rapidly deteriorat­ing, her doctor at MD Anderson Cancer Center told her she had one last hope: a new drug that inhibits DNA repair in cancer cells, which had shown great promise in clinical trials with patients that had her specific genetic mutation.

But Sloan did not qualify for a clinical trial. And while the drug had passed safety trials, it was not yet approved by the FDA. She would have to seek “compassion­ate use.” After months of lobbying (and being turned down by one manufactur­er), she finally convinced another to grant her access. She was ready to begin treatment, but then she hit a deadly roadblock: Before she could obtain the drug that her physician recommende­d and that a manufactur­er was willing to provide, she had to beg the FDA for approval. Her doctor was forced to spend around 100 hours filling out FDA paperwork (a requiremen­t that has since been streamline­d, thanks to public pressure). Then, the FDA took 24 days to review the applicatio­n.

As Sloan waited, her health deteriorat­ed further. In an interview for the book “The Right to Try: How the Federal Government Prevents Americans from Getting the Lifesaving Treatments They Need,” which I co-wrote, Sloan’s best friend Michelle Wittenberg told me about Sloan’s anguish as she waited on the green light from Washington. “She would say, ‘Michelle, what’s going on? What’s the delay? The drug company’s agreed to give it, why is it taking so long?’” When the FDA finally relented, the drug worked. Scans showed it beating back her cancer. But it was too late. Shortly after getting the scans, Sloan came down with pneumonia. Thirteen days later, she died. “The delay in getting that drug that was working killed her,” Wittenberg said. “The extra month tacked on because of the FDA process? Too long.”

Wittenberg formed “Andi’s Army” to lobby the Texas state Legislatur­e to pass a “Right to Try” law that would grant those in Texas with terminal illnesses (and who have exhausted all FDA-approved treatments) access to investigat­ional drugs — so long as they have been proven safe in clinical trials, are part of the FDA’s ongoing evaluation process and the company developing the medication is willing to make it available. In 2015, Gov. Greg Abbott signed the Andrea Sloan Right to Try Act into law.

Today, 40 states have passed similar laws (including New Hampshire). And on Wednesday, President Trump signed a national Right to Try Act into law.

In the states, Right to Try has not been a partisan issue. In most instances, it passed without a single dissenting vote. The issue brought together politician­s who never worked together on any other issue. In Illinois, for example, the bill was cosponsore­d by state Sen. Mike Connelly, a socially conservati­ve Republican, and state Rep. Greg Harris, a liberal Democrat who is HIV-positive. As Connelly told me, “This is the first bill I’ve ever encountere­d that is both pro-life and pro-choice. It gives people the freedom to choose to fight for their life.”

But, sadly, this spirit of bipartisan­ship did not translate to Washington. Only 22 House Democrats voted for the final bill that Trump signed. Democrats in Washington managed to take an issue that unified thousands of legislator­s from both parties in 40 states, and turned it into a divisive, party-line vote. Thanks to Trump, Americans facing terminal diagnoses will now have a new chance at life. How tragic — and pathetic — that Democrats refused to join him in making that happen.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States