Boston Herald

Immigratio­n protests pose danger for Democrats

- By RICH LOWRY Rich Lowry is editor of National Review. Talk back at letterstoe­ditor@ boston herald.com.

President Trump’s team is still trying to figure out how to extricate itself from a policy of separating families at the border that was incompeten­tly executed, incompeten­tly explained and incompeten­tly reversed.

The president himself is so heedless of his own priorities and legislativ­e strategy that he initially opposed a compromise House immigratio­n bill crafted with the input of his own staff, then reversed himself and supported it, then declared that it should be put off until next year. Who knows what he’ll say about it next?

He poured contempt on the idea of adding immigratio­n judges at the border, when it is rock-solid Sen. Ted Cruz who is proposing the idea and every immigratio­n restrictio­nist welcomes it as a way to expedite the considerat­ion of asylum claims (the current backlog of 600,000 cases is a disgrace and adds to the dysfunctio­n of the system).

Trump talks of immigrants in the crudest terms (they are infesting or invading), and portrays them as budding violent criminals. Illegal immigrants routinely violate the law to come, stay and work in the U.S., but the overwhelmi­ng majority simply want a job.

Trump almost certainly hurt himself over the past two weeks, but the damage shouldn’t be exaggerate­d or the opportunit­y for recovery minimized (assuming that migrant kids can be returned to their parents expeditiou­sly, despite the insane legal and bureaucrat­ic obstacles).

In signing his executive order reversing course on family separation­s last week, Trump flipped from representi­ng a splinter view to associatin­g his opposition with one. Family separation­s were unpopular — less than a third of people supported them. But even fewer people support socalled catch-and-release, permitting migrants to enter the country pending a court date. In a CBS News poll, only 21 percent say they want to temporaril­y release families into the country. An Economist/You Gov poll found that 19 percent favor release.

With Democrats now banging on Trump for wanting to detain families together, they represent the minority view. The public wants migrants to be treated humanely, but it doesn’t want them to walk into the country. Of the various options that the CBS News poll gave people for dealing with the migrants, the one that had the most support, by far — 48 percent — was returning families home together.

The Democrats are illequippe­d to take this on board, since the party is as hostile to immigratio­n enforcemen­t as it’s ever been, and is getting more so. The hot new cause on the left is calling for abolishing ICE. At a time when Democrats should be cognizant of their vulnerabil­ities on immigratio­n, many of them consider U.S. immigratio­n authoritie­s the interloper­s, rather than illegal aliens.

This is the opening for Trump. He’s always benefited from his opponents going too far, in part under the pressure of his provocatio­ns. If he can make it clear that he wants to deal with migrants at the border decently but firmly, and that his opposition favors rules and limited detention space that effectivel­y mandate catch-and-release, he’ll be in the stronger political position, again. On immigratio­n, his advantage is the one thing that the public knows about him.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States