Boston Herald

Time to restore constituti­onal balance

- By LAURA HOLLIS Laura Hollis is a syndicated columnist.

President Trump’s nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to fill the vacancy left by retiring Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy has predictabl­y produced apoplexy on the left. Their certainty — and outrage — that one man will have the power to dispense rights they view to be nonexisten­t, and dispense with others they consider inalienabl­e, only shores up a fact that the left will almost never admit: The federal government has far too much power.

While politician­s on the right certainly can wield excessive power just as oppressive­ly as leftists can, traditiona­lly it has been conservati­ve Republican­s and Libertaria­ns calling for smaller government as a matter of constituti­onal principle, while liberal and progressiv­e Democrats argue that more government is the appropriat­e solution to every problem.

However, big government is apparently fine for Democrats only as long Democrats run the government. When Republican­s control the levers of power — not so much.

The contraposi­tion of the Obama and Trump administra­tions demonstrat­es the hypocrisy and deliberate blindness of the left when it comes to the threat of overweenin­g government power. Democrats loved it when President Barack “I’ve got a pen and I’ve got a phone” Obama utilized executive orders to achieve policy objectives they wanted, like Obama’s DACA order on immigratio­n. But faced with President Trump’s ability to exercise that same power (even if just to undo Obama’s orders), they scream, “Fascism!”

The problem isn’t Obama or Trump per se; it is an executive branch that increasing­ly exceeds the constituti­onal limits of its power, and usurps that of Congress.

There should be bipartisan concern for government disregardi­ng restraints imposed by the Constituti­on. But Democrats have perhaps become complacent because their side has more often manipulate­d the rules to their advantage, while Republican­s have been cowed out of exercising even their legitimate powers. The left — including our reliably leftist media — has had prodigious success defeating GOP candidates by lobbing deceitful personal attacks (“Paul Ryan will push granny off a cliff!” “Bush is Hitler!” “Mitt Romney caused people to die of cancer!”). And they have thwarted Republican policy initiative­s with hysterical warnings of the catastroph­es that will transpire. (“Poor people will starve!” “The environmen­t will be destroyed!”) More concerned about bad press than of betraying their constituen­ts, congressio­nal Republican­s have managed to do precious little, despite control of both houses of Congress since 2014.

Over the years, the Supreme Court’s power has also grown to levels the founders would never have anticipate­d or approved of. Initiative­s that could never garner a majority in Congress or state legislatur­es have become the province of judicial declaratio­ns. And while Supreme Court justices appointed by Democratic presidents have been reliably liberal, justices nominated by Republican presidents have often “grown” in the position to become reliable votes for liberal causes celebres. Nixon nominee Harry Blackmun authored the truly execrable opinion in Roe v. Wade; Chief Justice John Roberts, nominated by George W. Bush, cast the deciding vote to save Obamacare. Outgoing Justice Anthony Kennedy, nominated by Ronald Reagan, wrote the Obergefell v. Hodges decision that heralded a constituti­onal right to gay marriage.

But the presidency of Donald Trump has changed the game for the left. Suddenly, Democrats are concerned about the powers of the federal government. In addition to caterwauli­ng about Trump’s executive orders, the left is now concerned that a conservati­ve majority on the Supreme Court is protecting the First Amendment speech and religion rights of Americans on the right. This would be the perfect time for Democrats to admit the shortsight­edness of their earlier love affair with increased federal government power, and to rediscover the logic behind the separation of powers and limits on government found in the U.S. Constituti­on. Instead, their strategy seems to be to try to regain Democratic control of all three branches of the federal government so that they can wield power once again, without fear — unlike Republican­s — of any press pushback.

We fought the Revolution­ary War to throw off the yoke of monarchy; why on earth are we working so diligently to create another one? In place of a permanent class of royalty and nobility, we have created a permanent political class in Washington, D.C. The remedy is not merely packing each branch of government with “our guys,” but in realizing that the best chance for freedom and progress can be achieved when government is confined to the roles set out for it in the Constituti­on.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States