Boston Herald

Trump offers dose of sanity

-

President Trump wants to offer Americans who can’t afford the Affordable Care Act’s health care premiums a cheaper alternativ­e, but detractors say it’s just a ploy to further weaken Obamacare, the former president’s signature policy achievemen­t.

Is anyone surprised that a basic pocketbook issue must be viewed through a blue-state, redstate lens?

The administra­tion has now allowed insurers to sell shortterm health plans, so that individual­s struggling to pay for the more expensive Obama-mandated policies have another option besides dropping insurance altogether. The administra­tion estimates that these plans’ premiums could be about one-third the cost of comprehens­ive coverage. That could mean a savings of more than $300 a month over a standard Obamacare plan. Obviously, less coverage comes with these lower-priced health plans. These policies offer limited benefits and may not honor existing medical conditions.

It’s plain these policies aren’t for everyone, and they don’t claim to be. But they do fill a niche market for people who are generally in good health, have a moderate income and who need short-term health insurance. It also makes sense for people needing temporary coverage due to changing situations, like a new job; retiring before Medicare eligibilit­y; or no longer qualifying for coverage under their parents’ plan. Administra­tion officials have indicated these plans can range up to 12 months and be possibly renewed for up to 36 months, though there’s no federal guarantee that will occur.

While critics will try to paint this initiative as just another Trump maneuver to undercut Obamacare, it’s clearly designed for people who don’t qualify for Affordable Care Act subsidies based on their income. That segment of previously uninsured Americans, as well as younger, healthier individual­s, clearly are the main beneficiar­ies of the Trump tax measure that did away with the monetary penalty for not carrying insurance. That segment of the population might now choose short-term coverage, which at least provides a basic safety net in case of ill health or injury.

Of course, Democrats, fearing the erosion of the assumption­s that made Obamacare viable, seem to care more about the flawed legacy of that policy than the welfare of many middle-class Americans caught in a health insurance squeeze. They’re afraid what they consider “junk insurance” will draw healthy people away from Obamacare’s healthinsu­rance exchange markets. They’re the ones who keep Obamacare afloat by subsidizin­g the cost of insuring the older, sicker pool of policyhold­ers. Without that base of claim-free premium payers, the Affordable Care Act becomes financiall­y unsustaina­ble. According to The Associated Press, insurers already are developing the “next generation” of short-term plans that will be more responsive to consumer needs, with pros and cons clearly spelled out. The administra­tion says it expects about 1.6 million people to pick a short-term option when the plans are fully phased in.

With these short-term individual plans, and “associatio­n health plans” for small businesses that can be offered across state lines, the Trump administra­tion is attempting to reintroduc­e competitio­n into the health care industry, which can only benefit the American health care consumer.

On a related note, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services announced Tuesday that, for the second year in a row, the average basic premium for a Medicare Part D prescripti­on drug plan in 2019 is projected to decline. Basic Part D premiums are expected to fall from $33.59 this year to $32.50 next year.

“President Trump and Secretary Alex Azar have made clear that prescripti­on drug costs must come down. The actions that HHS and CMS are taking to increase competitio­n in order to drive down costs for patients are working,” said CMS Administra­tor Seema Verma. “CMS will continue to strengthen the Part D program and bolster plans’ negotiatin­g power so they can get the best deal for seniors from prescripti­on drug manufactur­ers.”

While Congress hems and haws over the politics of Obamacare’s future, the Trump administra­tion is actually effecting positive change by using the policy tools it has available and relying on a strong sense of purpose.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States