Boston Herald

Left hypocritic­ally abandoning principles

- By LAURA HOLLIS Laura Hollis is a syndicated columnist.

Earlier last week, Candace Owens, a young black conservati­ve, was shouted out of a restaurant by a white crowd screaming obscenitie­s and racial epithets at her and her dining companion, Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk (who is white). The police had to be called, and the mob shouted obnoxious slurs at the officers as well. Owens tweeted: “To be clear: ANTIFA, an all-white fascist organizati­on, just grew violent and attacked an all-black and Hispanic police force.

“Because I, a BLACK woman, was eating breakfast.

“Is this the civil rights era all over again?”

It is. And many Democrats are on the wrong side.

It would be easy to dismiss that statement as hyperbole if this were not the latest in a distressin­gly long line of examples of the left abandoning principles in pursuit of the bogeymen they themselves have created.

Also within the past week, The New York Times announced that it had hired tech writer Sarah Jeong to join its editorial board. Jeong has a long history of nasty and racist tweets directed against white people. She claimed that she was merely responding to trolls who had lobbed racial insults at her. But Jeong also tweeted insults against men in general, as well as police, and this went on for more than a year. Video has now emerged of Jeong spewing her ignorance and hatred during a speech at Harvard Law School.

The Times stands behind Jeong. Some applaud this as long-overdue courage in the face of torch-and-pitchfork crowds. Perhaps. But Jeong’s conduct isn’t merely bigoted; it is also immature and unprofessi­onal and, in the case of her University of Virginia rape-hoax tweets, completely counterfac­tual. The Columbia School of Journalism issued a scathing report slamming Rolling Stone’s article about the alleged gang rape at UVA, and Rolling Stone lost one defamation case (and settled a second) as a result of it. This is who the Times hires, at a time when the press complains about diminishin­g credibilit­y?

And then there’s the double standard. From the “free speech for me but not for thee” file, Alex Jones and his company InfoWars have been banned from most major social media platforms, including YouTube, Pinterest, Apple, Spotify, Facebook, LinkedIn and MailChimp. (Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey is taking flak for not having banned Jones. Yet.)

Yes, Jones is a buffoon and a conspiracy theorist, and these are all private companies. But claims that it’s OK to expunge his views because he’s “extreme” don’t fly. Button-down conservati­ve writer Dennis Prager’s educationa­l and inoffensiv­e PragerU videos have routinely been censored on YouTube (including, ironically, Wall Street Journal writer Kim Strassel’s video on censorship). Republican congressio­nal candidate (and Cambodian immigrant) Elizabeth Heng saw her campaign commercial (referencin­g her parents’ survival of the Khmer Rouge genocide) taken down by Facebook. Serious scholars like Charles Murray, Heather MacDonald and Christina Hoff Sommers have been assaulted on or banned from college campuses. Conservati­ves have seen private and government attacks on their free speech and free exercise rights. And when they attempt to defend those rights, no less than Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan characteri­zes these efforts as “weaponizin­g the First Amendment.”

The left used to defend individual rights against government oppression and bigoted mobs. Now we see the IRS use its powers against conservati­ve nonprofits. Predawn “John Doe” police raids are conducted against conservati­ve politician­s and their supporters. Our federal law enforcemen­t agencies are populated by people whose “progressiv­e” political bias taints their judgment — if not their actual conduct. Masked armies of leftist “antifa” vigilantes attack and injure people, and destroy property.

And the liberal press yawns. No big deal as long as it’s happening to people we don’t like.

There’s an old saying: When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. And when half the people in the country are considered threats to democracy and human existence — as the left now views everyone who disagrees with it politicall­y — then every tool is on the table: screaming in people’s faces, social media witch hunts, deprivatio­n of fundamenta­l rights and even violence.

To their credit, many Democrats and other liberals and progressiv­es see the ugly irony and have spoken out against the violence, harassment and abandonmen­t of traditiona­l Democratic values. But it’s an open question whether those saner, sober voices will carry the day.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States