Boston Herald

Upon review, it’s natural growth

- By BRIAN MAHONEY

NEW YORK — A ball appears to land perfectly on the line and Anja Vreg practicall­y leaps from her chair.

She’s not sitting in the stands. She’s not even sitting on the same side of the street.

She does, however, have one of the best spots to watch the action during the first week of the U.S. Open.

Vreg is a review official monitoring a match on the screens in the office being used for video replay on the outer courts at the USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center.

The U.S. Open this year became the first Grand Slam tournament to have electric line calling on all courts. That was of particular importance to doubles players, who usually don’t get to play in the stadiums where it was previously available until the later rounds.

“I think actually this is quite fair because it can change a match,” said Pierre-Hugues Herbert, who teamed with Nicolas Mahut to win a match on Court 12 yesterday.

Reviews on Arthur Ashe Stadium, Louis Armstrong Stadium, the Grandstand and Court 17, the Open’s four main courts, are still conducted within those stadiums. But to enable the technology on the outer courts, the office was set up within the broadcast compound on the grounds.

Most fans attending the twoweek tournament will likely never notice the small white door that simply reads “Electric Line Calling.” But key points of matches can be determined within its walls.

“It’s kind of a nondescrip­t room and what goes on inside is very different,” said Oliver Clough, a project manager for Hawk-Eye, the company behind the system that tracks the trajectory of each shot.

Unlike the stadiums, the smaller outer courts lack the capabiliti­es to conduct the reviews. The review office was cheaper than building a spot at each court, and more in line with how replays are being conducted in other pro sports.

Each match is monitored by a two-person team watching four views of the court. Review officials such as Vreg are U.S. Tennis Associatio­n officials, while the engineer seated alongside her operating the system is a Hawk-Eye employee.

They can watch the action from 10 cameras positioned around each court and can hear audio of everything happening on it, and the review official is equipped with a microphone, telephone and radio to speak directly to the chair umpire when necessary. The goal is to be able to provide the view to get an in-or-out ruling in about 10 seconds, and sometimes they get a head start even before the umpire announces a player is challengin­g a call when they see a shot close enough that they believe it will be disputed.

The impact has been substantia­l. Clough said there had already been more than 1,500 reviews this year, 801 alone in the first two days of play. There were only 459 challenges for the entire event in 2009.

“So that’s the kind of scale that has happened here,” he said.

The use of technology will only increase. Where the U.S. Open once could only rely on line-ofsight reviews, the video feeds and bunker setup have provided a way to make every court equal.

“We see it in a number of sports now,” Clough said. “I think it’s a natural progressio­n for tennis to move to a centralize­d location on site.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States