Boston Herald

Confer with new boss to improve reviews

- By MARIE G. MCINTYRE

My last three performanc­e reviews have been disappoint­ing. The manager who hired me always gave me outstandin­g ratings, but ever since he left, I have been rated as “meets expectatio­ns.”

During this year’s discussion, “Bob,” my current supervisor, raved about how I had developed creative solutions, improved work processes and effectivel­y trained new employees. However, he did not include these remarks in my written review. When I questioned my average rating, Bob said upper management would not agree to a higher score.

To make matters worse, my colleagues and I recently discovered that Bob gave us identical appraisals. All our ratings and comments were exactly the same. He apparently completed one review form and then made three copies with different names.

Fortunatel­y, Bob is now transferri­ng to another management position. When our new supervisor arrives, how can I get her to give me a better rating?

Being both cowardly and lazy, Bob provides a perfect example of how to mismanage the appraisal process. So before discussing your disappoint­ment, let’s focus for a moment on his dreadful approach to performanc­e reviews.

Bob’s first mistake was lavishing you with verbal praise that was omitted from the official document. Then, instead of providing helpful feedback, he blamed his bosses for your mediocre rating. Finally, he created four copycat review forms, which should probably be reported to human resources.

Regarding your ratings decline, there are several possibilit­ies. Your hiring manager might have had different expectatio­ns than those who followed him. Your company could have decided to combat “ratings inflation” by limiting the number of high scores allowed. Or perhaps your performanc­e has actually slipped a bit.

But regardless of the cause, the upcoming management change provides a perfect opportunit­y for a fresh start. Talk with your new boss about her definition of outstandin­g performanc­e for your position, and then make a concerted effort to deliver those results.

Our new co-worker is a most unpleasant person. “Steve” is easily frustrated and prone to angry outbursts. He complains constantly and blames others when he makes mistakes. Steve also does little work. He is usually chatting with friends or playing games on his phone. He even bragged about watching an entire movie at his desk.

Because Steve is still a probationa­ry employee, he could easily be let go. However, our boss is located in a different area, so he may be unaware of these issues. How can we inform him without looking like a bunch of tattletale­s?

By allowing a probationa­ry deadline to slip, many managers get stuck with problemati­c employees, so your group’s feedback could be quite helpful. Just be sure to provide factual observatio­ns, not a litany of personal complaints.

For example: “We wanted to let you know that we have concerns about Steve. He spends a lot of time on non-work activities and frequently complains about his job. He also gets angry easily and avoids taking responsibi­lity for his errors. Since he is still in his probationa­ry period, we thought we should share this informatio­n.”

Answer any questions your manager may have, thank him for listening, and then go on about your business. Regardless of what he ultimately decides, you will have provided a useful perspectiv­e.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States