Boston Herald

Chips are down on sports gambling

House Republican­s want to rein in betting

-

House Republican­s strongly favor new federal regulation­s on sports gambling after the Supreme Court allowed states to open sports books.

At a hearing of a House Judiciary subcommitt­ee, GOP members yesterday expressed concerns about advertisem­ents and online gambling platforms targeting minors, as well as the potential for match-fixing.

“For Congress to do nothing is the worst possible alternativ­e,” said Rep. Jim Sensenbren­ner, a Wisconsin Republican. “We have some work to do, and I’m looking forward to working with you to try to come up with something both short term and something more permanent to deal with this issue. I’m afraid if we don’t, there are going to be people who get hurt and get hurt badly.”

The hearing was the first Congress has held on the issue since the Supreme Court decision in June to strike down a law that limited sports gambling to four states, and full-service sports books only to Nevada. Since then, Delaware, New Jersey, Mississipp­i and West Virginia have legalized betting on pro and amateur sports, with more states considerin­g adding sports books to their existing racetracks or casinos.

The prospect of federal action, however, is murky at best. No bill has been introduced that would enact the reforms discussed by Sensenbren­ner and other GOP members, and the committee may have different priorities if Democrats take over the House in the midterm elections.

The hearing occurred at the same time the Senate Judiciary Committee was hearing testimony from Christine Blasey Ford, who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault, and Sensenbren­ner acknowledg­ed that most of Washington’s attention was focused elsewhere.

A gambling-industry representa­tive and a Nevada regulator told the committee that states were fully capable of regulating sports gambling on their own and said many of the fears about the ills of expanded sports gambling have not been realized.

The industry’s position is that legalizati­on is good for bettors and sports leagues because it will move sports betting from illegal offshore operators to licensed businesses that pay taxes and have consumer protection­s. Gambling proponents also argue that match-fixing and other nefarious activities are easier to prevent and snuff out in a regulated market.

 ?? AP FILE PHOTO ?? NO DICE: People talk to tellers while placing bets at the Meadowland­s Racetrack in East Rutherford, N.J. House Republican­s met yesterday to voice support for new federal regulation­s on sports gambling.
AP FILE PHOTO NO DICE: People talk to tellers while placing bets at the Meadowland­s Racetrack in East Rutherford, N.J. House Republican­s met yesterday to voice support for new federal regulation­s on sports gambling.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States