Boston Herald

Fears overblown of Russian meddling

- By BETSY MCCAUGHEY Betsy McCaughey is a senior fellow at the London Center for Policy Research and a former lieutenant governor of New York.

The Justice Department announced charges against Russian social media manipulato­r Elena Khusyaynov­a on Friday. She is accused of conspiring to set up fake Facebook and Twitter accounts under names such as “Bertha Malone,” “Rachell Edison” and “wokeluisa” that posted “tens of thousands of messages” about gun rights, immigratio­n, the midterm elections and other controvers­ial topics.

No one wants to see foreign nations meddling in our politics. But don’t be bamboozled by the fanfare over this criminal complaint. Federal officials claim going after Khusyaynov­a is part of a necessary crackdown because propaganda machines like hers “undermine confidence in our democratic institutio­ns” and mislead voters.

Truth is, these officials are grandstand­ing. Khusyaynov­a, an accountant who manages financial transactio­ns for the conspirato­rs, resides in St. Petersburg, Russia, and there is no extraditio­n treaty with Russia. That means she’ll never go to trial. What a waste of taxpayers’ money for investigat­ors and lawyers with no end game. It’s a Justice Department vanity project.

Officials are wildly overstatin­g the impact of foreign propaganda operations like Khusyaynov­a’s on voters. The impact is minuscule. Twitter’s lawyer told the Senate Judiciary committee that Russian tweets “represente­d a very small fraction of the overall activity on Twitter in the 10-week period preceding the 2016 election.” How small? Less than two one-hundredths of a percent (0.016 percent) of the total accounts on Twitter at the time, and 1 percent of overall election-related tweets. In short, Russians added nothing more than a tiny whisper to the political clamor.

That was also true of the fake postings made by 13 Russians indicted last spring by special counsel Robert Mueller. His mandate is to look into the Trump campaign’s possible collusion with Russian officials to influence the 2016 election, but so far Mueller has failed to connect any dots.

In the absence of collusion, Washington officials need to moderate their hysteria over foreigners on social media. Last March, Congress approved grants to the states to improve voting technology. In September, President Trump authorized tougher sanctions against nations that tamper with American election equipment, not just social media. The focus should be on keeping Vladimir Putin’s cyber-thugs from altering an election.

This week, the U.S. Cyber Command acknowledg­ed that it’s been warning foreign operatives to stop their misinforma­tion campaigns.

Unfortunat­ely, liberal media outlets and Democrats in Congress, including Sen. Dianne Feinstein, are urging tech companies to take on the role of speech police against social media misinforma­tion campaigns, both domestic and foreign. Yikes. That would be devastatin­g to our democracy.

Social media should be the 21st century version of the public square. It’s true that rogue foreigners are invading it, but so far the harm is minor. What Americans cannot risk is ceding to Silicon Valley liberals — or any group — the power to limit access to opposing views. That would be far more dangerous than Russian meddling.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States