Boston Herald

New types of reverse mortgages worth a look

- By KENNETH R. HARNEY

WASHINGTON — You’ve probably seen actor Tom Selleck suavely pitching federally insured reverse mortgages on TV and thought, hmm, that sounds interestin­g. He says you can turn your home equity into cash and not pay back anything — no principal, no interest, no fees — for years after your retirement. And it’s true: Some form of a reverse mortgage could be a good choice for you, but it might not be the government-backed type Selleck is hawking. Those loans have hit tough times, and growing numbers of lenders have begun offering alternativ­es — proprietar­y, nongovernm­ent reverse mortgages, including an innovative variant unveiled last month that allows owners to retain their current lowinteres­t-rate regular mortgages while pulling out additional funds via the industry’s only “secondlien” reverse loan.. Federally insured reverse mortgages are targeted at homeowners 62 years and older. They allow borrowers to supplement their retirement incomes by converting their home equity into cash via lump sum payments, monthly payments or credit lines. No repayment of the debt is required until the homeowners sell the house, move out or die. If the amounts borrowed exceed what the house can bring in a sale, the lender can file a claim against FHA’s mortgage-insurance fund and receive compensati­on. Because of continuing multibilli­on-dollar insurance-fund losses, FHA has tried to rein in the reverse-mortgage program by limiting the amounts seniors can bor- row against their houses, raising insurance premiums, and requiring applicants to demonstrat­e that they are creditwort­hy. These restrictio­ns and other issues such as high fees have contribute­d to the program’s sharp plunge in volume, from just under 115,000 new loans in 2009 to 48,385 in fiscal 2018, the lowest total since 2005. Drastic declines in business volume like this have spurred lenders to come up with alternativ­es. At least four major companies now offer proprietar­y, nongovernm­ent reverse mortgages. They include Finance of America Reverse, Reverse Mortgage Funding, Longbridge Financial and One Reverse Mortgage. All of them allow much larger maximum-loan amounts than FHA. They also charge no mortgage-insurance premiums, and may permit more loans to owners of condominiu­m units. Kristen Sieffert, president of Finance of America Reverse — which continues to offer standard FHA-insured reverse mortgages along with its four proprietar­y alternativ­es — told me “we want to create a new proprietar­y product market for the long haul” that offers homeowners nationwide more flexibilit­y and innovation than FHA can. For example, at the end of September, her firm debuted the industry’s first and only “second-lien” reverse mortgage, which is designed to allow owners who have low fixed rates on a first mortgage to retain that loan while tapping their equity via a fixed-rate second mortgage requiring no immediate repayments. Other companies’ proprietar­y offerings have their own special niche features designed to improve on FHA’s rules: Equity Edge’s program lowers the eligibilit­y age for some borrowers to 60 instead of 62; One Reverse Mortgage permits loans on houses with solar panels, to cite just a couple of examples. Proprietar­y reverse loans have their own downsides, however. Generally, they are not aimed at the lower- to moderate-cost housing market like FHA, so they screen out potentiall­y large numbers of owners from coverage. They may limit the total amount of equity you can access more strictly than FHA and require better credit histories. Like all reverse mortgages, proprietar­y alternativ­es should only be considered after discussion­s with an experience­d financial counselor to make certain you’re getting a good deal. Bottom line: They’re an important, growing resource for senior homeowners and worth at least a look if you’re considerin­g a reverse mortgage.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States