Boston Herald

Warren’s rhetoric is risky, prejudicia­l

-

Elizabeth Warren’s presidenti­al campaign began under a cloud of controvers­y but her unenviable position does not mean she should engage in irresponsi­ble oratory just to gain some traction.

Warren made explosive comments Sunday during a campaign stop in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. “By the time we get to 2020, Donald Trump may not even be president. In fact, he may not even be a free person,” she declared. The president is under investigat­ion by FBI special counsel Robert Mueller for possible Russia campaign collusion.

Thus far there has been no collusion found but it is possible that Mueller could file a report or a series of reports that spur Congress into impeachmen­t proceeding­s.

Warren’s predisposi­tion that President Trump may possibly be in jail illustrate­s a prejudice that would fly in the face of the Senate’s role. The Constituti­on requires a two-thirds vote of the Senate to convict, and the penalty for an impeached official is removal from office. As with the impeachmen­t of President Clinton, there would be deliberati­ons conducted in supposed good faith. Warren’s flippant remarks belie that possibilit­y.

As the Herald’s Hillary Chabot reported, Republican National Committee spokeswoma­n Kayleigh McEnany found the senator’s remarks to be irresponsi­ble. “To say that he may not be a free person is just a really radical, extreme statement and another falsehood from Elizabeth Warren,” McEnany told Herald Radio Monday, referring to Warren’s exaggerate­d claim of Native American ancestry first reported in the Herald.

“I think that’s an extreme statement that has no bearing in truth. The president’s done nothing wrong,” McEnany said. “The Mueller investigat­ion is about to wrap up if you believe the reporting that’s out there and the president will walk away from that.”

Either way, such language from the senior senator does nothing but spread disunity and anxiety in the public.

There is no doubt that had Warren put the Native American issue to bed in 2012 when the Herald broke the story, she would be in a better position to run for president and thus would be free from having to resort to incendiary language.

The American people should not be burdened by Warren’s inability to explain away why she claimed to be an “American Indian.” That is on her.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States