Boston Herald

Democrats fan flames with deceptive statements

- By JAY AMBROSE Jay Ambrose is a syndicated columnist.

Heaven help us, because politics surely isn’t.

Now we have two Democratic presidenti­al candidates saying that a white policeman was committing murder when he shot and killed an innocent black man in Ferguson, Mo. In fact, a tediously careful federal investigat­ion cleared the officer of anything criminal, just the defense of his own life, but that has not stopped Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris from what is either inexcusabl­e ignorance or spirited political opportunis­m helping to stir up racial enmity.

Their deceptive statements make things worse, not better, after the horrific mass shooting in El Paso, Texas, aimed at killing Hispanics. The leftist concoction today is that it’s not just President Trump who is a racist; it’s his supporters, most Republican­s, confused conservati­ves and of course cops, police, these villains of society.

The Ferguson incident sparked similar arguments about policemen, and soon enough we had riots in Ferguson and outrage throughout the country growing worse as other police shootings of black people occurred. The fact is that the young man who was shot, Michael Brown, had just recently stolen some cigarillos from a store and punched the policeman in the face as he sat in his car. DNA tests helped prove as much. Later the massively sized 18-year-old rushed at the policeman despite demands he stop and, if the cop had said, oh well, so what, Brown could have wrestled away his gun and blown his brains out.

Some witnesses, who happened to be black and courageous, verified this story, but here we are, five years later, and Warren and Harris are verifying their inability to serve in the White House. Even some liberal commentato­rs are having at them, if not their debate-stage comrades named Bill de Blasio, Tim Ryan, Bernie Sanders, Kirsten Gillibrand and Beto O’Rourke. They spout a similar yarn while at least avoiding the word “murder.”

Heather Mac Donald, a researcher at the Manhattan Institute, has persuasive­ly contended that vicious condemnati­on of police makes police less proactive and heightened homicides and other crimes in large cities in the last two years of the critical Obama administra­tion. The stats went down after the election of Trump, someone who spoke well of police.

There obviously are bad cops and there obviously is mistreatme­nt of black Americans, and the Ferguson police operation did appear racially prejudiced. But a recent study published by the National Academy of Sciences shows that white policemen are no more likely to shoot black civilians than black policemen and that there is no policeshoo­ting epidemic.

Many police around the country are right now working for better community relationsh­ips, and that is good. What’s needed generally is more mutual understand­ing, more principled, reasonable compromise, an understand­ing of how slavery and Jim Crow have their sad legacies, along with an appreciati­on of how far we have come. All sorts of major cultural issues are at devious work behind the scenes, and we should engage with them. What we don’t need is factually amiss name-calling as a substitute for debate.

To be calling everyone you disagree with a racist all the time is to trivialize this most excruciati­ng of characteri­zations into just an angry, confused way of talking.

None of this is to say that Trump is an example of the better angels of our nature or that there are no rational reasons to want to replace him, but, except for a few with almost no support, the current crop of Democratic candidates does more to boggle the mind than inspire it.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States