Boston Herald

CAMBRIDGE FIGHTS POT RULING, BIZSMART,

Cambridge appealing ruling after pot shop wins fight over 2-year ban

- By STEFAN GELLER and JOE DWINELL

Less than a month after Cambridge’s attempt to ban a medical marijuana dispensary from selling to all adults for two years was ruled unconstitu­tional in superior court, the city announced that it has filed an emergency motion to halt the ruling — a decision ripped by the local pot shop.

“The City’s actions in pursuing an appeal reflect a contempt for the Court and the rule of law,” Revolution­ary Clinics, one of the shops hit by Cambridge’s moratorium, said in a statement. “Rather than working toward solutions and sound policy that can have a tangible impact, the City continues to play politics.”

The announceme­nt comes after a Middlesex Superior Court judge ruled on Jan. 24 that the moratorium on Revolution­ary Clinics opening a retail pot shop violated the Home Rule Amendment to the Massachuse­tts Constituti­on and state cannabis law.

Superior Court Associate Justice Kathleen M. McCarthy stated that lifting the ban “promotes the public interest” by “invalidati­ng conflictin­g local ordinances.”

Last fall, the Cambridge City Council approved the two-year moratorium during which only “economic empowermen­t candidates” as designated by the Cannabis Control Commission could operate retail pot shops in the city. The empowermen­t program was designed to help businesses in communitie­s disproport­ionately and negatively affected by the prior criminaliz­ation of weed.

Revolution­ary Clinics filed a lawsuit, by Boston law firm Saul, Ewing, Arnstein and Lehr, in Middlesex Superior Court this past fall seeking to prevent the city from enforcing the ordinance, which it calls “unlawful” because “it authorizes Cambridge and its city officials to determine who may operate cannabis businesses in Cambridge.”

When the court’s ruling was made last month, Revolution­ary Clinics praised it and said it would allow their company, and others, “to move quickly” to open adult-use pot shops in the city.

“The decision determined that the injunction in favor of Revolution­ary Clinics ‘promotes the public interest’ and validates its significan­t investment­s in protecting patient access to safe, regulated, high-quality products in Cambridge,” a company statement said.

Revolution­ary Clinics claimed in October that it would cost the company $700,000 a month in lost profits by not being allowed to sell recreation­al weed in the city. The company has medical pot shops in Cambridge and Somerville and plans to open another store in Cambridge this year.

The lawsuit also claimed that, “Not only does Cambridge’s adoption of the Two-Year Moratorium offend the will of Cambridge Voters” — about 71% of whom voted in favor of legalizing weed — “it was brazenly enacted in the face of warnings by the drafters of the cannabis laws that it would be illegal.”

 ??  ??
 ?? NANCY LANE / HERALD STAFF FILE ?? ‘CONTEMPT FOR THE COURT’: Revolution­ary Clinics, a medical pot shop in Cambridge, is fighting the city to try and open an adult-use recreation­al marijuana dispensary.
NANCY LANE / HERALD STAFF FILE ‘CONTEMPT FOR THE COURT’: Revolution­ary Clinics, a medical pot shop in Cambridge, is fighting the city to try and open an adult-use recreation­al marijuana dispensary.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States