Boston Herald

Media puts hatred over public interest

Pick at prez’s virus briefings

- Jaclyn CASHMAN

Does the media really have no shame in their hatred for Donald Trump?

Several networks have questioned whether they should stop airing President Trump’s daily coronaviru­s briefings for “ethical reasons.” Several networks have stopped covering the whole briefings live.

What could be more important than hearing from the most powerful person on the planet and top health officials during a pandemic? Certainly not navel-gazing talking heads criticizin­g his response to the crisis. They have the rest of the day to do that.

The only ethics that should be in question is their petty partisan opinions they are unable to hide and their willingnes­s to keep vital informatio­n from the public. These briefings have lifeand-death informatio­n from experts. If it was Trump talking politics for two hours that would be an entirely separate issue. He is referring all technical and medical questions to the doctors and federal agency heads standing beside him. He is highlighti­ng the efforts made by governors, by private corporatio­ns, by biotechnol­ogy firms, by the military and by common people. He is leading.

People are afraid and these briefings offer Americans what they want: new informatio­n and the sense that our leaders are on this.

But that’s not the message from the self-absorbed, biased media. ABC’s Jonathan Karl was recently asked if these briefings are as much about politics as they are about informatio­n, “There clearly has been a political message, as well as a really important public health message. Should these briefings be carried live from beginning to end by the various networks? But let’s face it, there’s a lot of politics here. There has been a lot of disinforma­tion that has come out as well. So, it is our duty as reporters and, frankly, as networks to put context and to correct misinforma­tion.”

Odd, coming from a media that has been vacillatin­g wildly between portraying Trump’s efforts to combat virus as alarmist, racist, then inadequate, and racist again. But their real concern is that Trump’s winning this communicat­ion battle.

The New York Times has written several stories about whether networks should be covering these briefings and seems bothered that “Mr. Trump and his coronaviru­s updates have attracted an average audience of 8.5 million on cable news, roughly the viewership of the season finale of ‘The Bachelor.’ ”

It appears the former reality star is still ahead in the ratings game against one of the top reality shows. And with his approval numbers up, he’s up in that ratings game as well, to the ill-disguised discomfitu­re of the media.

Hard-left MSNBC host Rachel Maddow declared to her viewers, “I would stop putting those briefings on live TV — not out of spite, but because it’s misinforma­tion.” Oh no, no spite involved, Rachel.

At a time of crisis, the American media can’t get out of its own way and realize it isn’t about them. It is about the national interest.

 ?? GETTY IMAGES ?? INFORMING THE PUBLIC: President Trump and Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, hold a press briefing with members of the White House Coronaviru­s Task Force on Sunday in Washington, D.C.
GETTY IMAGES INFORMING THE PUBLIC: President Trump and Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, hold a press briefing with members of the White House Coronaviru­s Task Force on Sunday in Washington, D.C.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States