Boston Herald

Economy in crisis

Politician­s debate need for moreaid

-

WASHINGTON — The unparallel­ed speed of the collapse of the U.S. economy, forcing more than 36 million Americans out of work, has left an all-toocommon political divide, with many Republican­s seeing reasons to believe the worst is over while Democrats call for more aid to stave off a possible depression.

After approving nearly $3 trillion to help stem staggering losses for businesses and workers, Republican­s say they want to see if that aid is sufficient as unemployme­nt claims slow and shelter-inplace orders are eased. But House Democrats argue that another $3 trillion rescue package is urgently needed or the crisis will worsen and workers could suffer permanent dislocatio­n, a view shared generally by Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell.

The political gridlock baffles many economists who see the need for action on multiple fronts.

“It’s crazy,” said Timothy Bartik, a senior economist at the Upjohn Institute in Michigan. “It makes no sense to me.”

One reason for their concern is the many uncertaint­ies that lie ahead. Will the coronaviru­s start to fade as a threat? Will customers return to stores? Will colleges and schools reopen? Will smaller companies still have enough cash to operate as the lockdown eases?

What is clear are the risks of atrophy if the U.S. economy spends too much time shuttered, the risks of further job losses because of slashed state and city budgets and the risks for incumbents seeking re-election with the worst economic numbers since the Great Depression.

Bartik estimates that cutbacks by state and local government­s due to lost tax revenues would cause the overall U.S. economy to shrink by 4% annually, unless the government­s receive roughly $1 trillion in federal help over two years. His numbers align with the proposal by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, though he would prefer if the funding was tied to economic data so that its distributi­on could be adjusted as needed.

But Democrats could err if they fail to find ways to reopen the economy, as the job losses are of such a magnitude that the economy could suffer lasting damage. Harvard University economist James Stock said at a webinar held Tuesday by the

Brookings Institutio­n that people need to start returning to their jobs, while avoiding mass gatherings such as baseball games and backyard barbecues in order to contain the disease.

“It’s clear we need to reopen the economy now — this is urgent,” said Stock, adding that the situation is delicate given the risks of a second wave of infections.

The situation is so uncertain that Powell took the unusual step of saying that lawmakers must do more for the communitie­s that elected them.

His words were phrased in the language of bureaucrat­s, but his message was clear: More money is needed now.

“Additional fiscal support could be costly but worth it if it helps avoid long-term economic damage and leaves us with a stronger recovery,” Powell said Wednesday. “This trade-off is one for our elected representa­tives, who wield powers of taxation and spending.”

Voters have sent mixed messages about the economy and political leaders, as the vast majority of people who lost jobs expect to be rehired. More than half approve of President Trump’s handling of the economy, even though 71% described economic conditions as poor.

Republican­s can point toward some optimistic signs. Requests for unemployme­nt aid fell to 3 million last week from a peak of 6.9 million at the end of March. Industry data hint that drops in retail spending bottomed out in the middle of April.

Their message has been that the U.S. economy deserves some time to digest the record financial aid that is already flowing through the economy. Republican­s also hope easing stay-home orders will kick-start the economy and reduce the need for more aid.

“Our view is, let’s take a step back for a few weeks,” Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin told Fox Business Network on Thursday. “For now, we don’t need more money in the states. We need to see how this plays out.”

House Democrats countered with the sweeping $3 trillion aid package, which was passed by the House on Friday and now goes to the Senate, heeding Powell’s advice, as Pelosi put it, to “go big.”

The Democrats’ package is centered on billions to help cash-strapped states and cities avert layoffs. Relying on historical­ly low interest rates to finance spending, it includes another round of $1,200 cash payments to Americans, money for mortgage and rental assistance, and stepped up virus testing.

“The American people,” Pelosi said, “are worth it.”

But Trump declared the package “dead on arrival” and issued a veto threat. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell labeled it “a seasonal catalog of leftwing oddities.”

 ?? GETTY IMAGES ?? POWER PUSH: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi stalks the halls of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., wearing a mask as she pushed through House passage of a record $3 trillion coronaviru­s response package on Friday. The measure is said to be dead on arrival in the Senate as Republican­s take a more cautious approach to additional aid.
GETTY IMAGES POWER PUSH: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi stalks the halls of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., wearing a mask as she pushed through House passage of a record $3 trillion coronaviru­s response package on Friday. The measure is said to be dead on arrival in the Senate as Republican­s take a more cautious approach to additional aid.
 ?? AP FILE ?? BACKER: Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell is said to be supportive of the Democrats second $3 trillion coronaviru­s relief package, warning the economy could suffer permanent damage without it.
AP FILE BACKER: Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell is said to be supportive of the Democrats second $3 trillion coronaviru­s relief package, warning the economy could suffer permanent damage without it.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States