Boston Herald

Police reform bill postponed

Issue pushed to Monday

- By Marie szaniszlo

After back-to-back days of false starts, the Massachuse­tts Senate held a rare weekend session Saturday in hopes of reaching consensus on a sweeping police reform bill, only to put it off after just an hour of debate until Monday.

“We need to get this bill on the governor’s desk,” Sen. William Brownsberg­er, D-Belmont, said. “Delay is the enemy of success here.”

Sen. Ryan Fattman, R-Sutton, for the third day in a row used a parliament­ary procedure to table the bill, stopping the full Senate from considerin­g it after pushback from police unions over the bill’s bid to limit qualified immunity, which would allow officers to be held personally liable for misconduct on the job.

The bill would create a civilianle­d board to oversee the state’s first-ever certificat­ion system for police officers, allow for suspension or decertific­ation of officers for misconduct, and permit officers to be held personally liable for wrongdoing on the job.

Boston Police Sgt. Eddy Chrispin, president of the Massachuse­tts

Associatio­n of Minority Law Enforcemen­t Officers, said he opposes doing away with qualified immunity because “officers can be acting reasonably but still be sued.”

“We are definitely for change in policing,” Chrispin told the Herald, “but we have to make sure we’re not making change just for the sake of making change.”

On Saturday, the Profession­al Fire Fighters of Massachuse­tts union entered the fray, saying that its members support many elements of the bill, but accused the Massachuse­tts Municipal Associatio­n of attempting to “hijack” the bill in order to strip public employees of due process and collective bargaining.

“My personal opinion is they’d just like to see civil service go away,” said PFFM President Rich MacKinnon Jr. “We’re not denying there should be changes. But as a union, we just want a seat at the table at a public hearing.”

In a statement on Wednesday, the MMA urged lawmakers to pass the bill and said cities and towns should have the authority to remove police and fire department­s from civil service without special legislatio­n or protracted negotiatio­ns.

“It is indisputab­le that … the state’s collective bargaining law for municipal employees has created a system of unresponsi­ve contract rules that make accountabi­lity of public employees for misconduct, particular­ly police and fire, almost impossible to implement,” the MMA said.

Senate Democrats are seeking to fast-track the bill filed last week, building on the momentum of a wave of national protests.

With barely three weeks remaining in the legislativ­e session, the bill must gain the approval of both the Senate and the House of Representa­tives before it can reach Gov. Charlie Baker’s desk.

The Senate will reconvene at 11 a.m. Monday.

 ?? PAUL CONNORS / BOSTON HERALD FILE ?? GREAT DEBATE: While police lined Beacon Street between Black Lives Matter protesters and conservati­ve protesters in front of the State House on June 27, this week legislator­s inside debated a police reform bill prompted by the protests.
PAUL CONNORS / BOSTON HERALD FILE GREAT DEBATE: While police lined Beacon Street between Black Lives Matter protesters and conservati­ve protesters in front of the State House on June 27, this week legislator­s inside debated a police reform bill prompted by the protests.
 ??  ?? FATTMAN
FATTMAN

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States