Boston Herald

House passes police bill

Compromise­s with Senate still to be ironed out

- By Sean philip Cotter Lisa Kashinksy contribute­d to this report.

The Massachuse­tts House of Representa­tives passed its version of a police reform bill late Friday night, setting the stage for negotiatio­ns between Legislativ­e leaders to try to work through the difference­s between this and the Senate’s bill.

The House passed the bill by a 93-66 vote after 10 p.m. Friday.

The House version follows the Senate’s also-nighttime passage of its own bill late last week. Both bills focus on more training and oversight of officers and limits on use of force, but the Senate’s is more sweeping, with cuts to qualified immunity, the legal doctrine that prevents many lawsuits against individual police officers.

Legislativ­e leaders will now meet in conference committee to try to hammer out the difference­s between the two bills, with the goal of sending an agreed-upon version to Gov. Charlie Baker’s desk. This House margin would not be enough to override a veto is the governor ultimately decided to scrap the bill.

House Speaker Bob DeLeo said in a statement, “Change is never easy, but with this vote, the House of Representa­tives acts to ensure fairness and equality. It is the product of countless hours of conversati­ons with a wide swath of stakeholde­rs, including the members of the Massachuse­tts Black and Latino Legislativ­e Caucus.”

State Rep. Nika Elugardo, a Boston Democrat who’s a major proponent of reform, said, “It’s a historic turn away from a mindset that accepts a lower standard of life and liberty for black, indigenous and other people of color. Now the real work begins to dismantle structural racism from within.”

But the House version left some progressiv­e activists in the cold.

The ACLU said in a statement, “Ultimately, this piece of legislatio­n misses the mark, because it will not help victims of violence hold police accountabl­e. Let’s be clear: Massachuse­tts is not immune to police misconduct. In order to make any laws about excessive use of force or other police abuses meaningful, Massachuse­tts must reform our civil rights laws—including by ending qualified immunity, which denies victims their day in court.”

Legislativ­e leaders also continue to face pressure and backlash from police unions and associatio­ns as the debate over reform legislatio­n continues. The Massachuse­tts Chiefs of Police Associatio­n, a group of nearly 400 municipal and campus law enforcemen­t executives and commanders, has labeled both branches’ proposals a “knee-jerk reaction,” and said the group continues “to be hurt, horrified and confused.”

 ?? StuARt CAhILL / hERALD StAFF FILE ?? EXTENDED DEBATE: The state House of Representa­tives worked late into the night on Friday, finally passing a broad-based police reform bill, which they hope to have reconciled with the already-approved Senate version by the end of the month.
StuARt CAhILL / hERALD StAFF FILE EXTENDED DEBATE: The state House of Representa­tives worked late into the night on Friday, finally passing a broad-based police reform bill, which they hope to have reconciled with the already-approved Senate version by the end of the month.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States