Boston Herald

Senate panel: Trump colluded with Russia in 2016 election

- Jeff ROBBINS Jeff Robbins is a Boston lawyer and former U.S. delegate to the United Nations Human Rights Commission.

“Dear President Putin,” wrote Donald Trump to Russian President Vladimir Putin on Dec. 19, 2007, congratula­ting the former KGB officer on being named Time Magazine’s Man of the Year. “You definitely deserve it. As you have probably heard, I am a big fan of yours.”

And as the Republican-led U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligen­ce confirmed last week after a bipartisan investigat­ion, the feeling is assuredly mutual. Putin wanted Donald Trump elected president, not Hillary Clinton, because Putin believed that Trump would serve Putin’s interests and that Clinton wouldn’t. Putin therefore interfered with America’s election to help Trump win it and to ensure that Clinton did not.

Not only did Trump welcome that help, but he solicited it, and he and his closest aides actively colluded with the Russians and their intermedia­ries to secure it and capitalize on it. And then, as the Senate committee found, Trump made false statements under oath about that collusion to special counsel Robert Mueller, in order to hide it.

Other than that, the Senate committee, chaired first by

Republican Richard Burr and then by Republican Marco Rubio, “exonerated” the president of collusion. Generally, once you hear this president deny that X is true, you can rest easy knowing that X is absolutely true, and the Senate report demonstrat­es that all the while Trump proclaimed “No Collusion,” the truth was “Yes, Collusion.”

For starters, the committee establishe­d that the notorious June 2016 meeting hosted at Trump Towers by Trump’s campaign manager, Paul Manafort, Trump sonin-law Jared Kushner and Donald Trump Jr. for the purpose of receiving Russian dirt on Hillary Clinton wasn’t just with any old Russians. It included Russians who had “significan­t connection­s to the Russian government, including the Russian intelligen­ce services.” The links between one of them and the Kremlin were, it stated, “far more extensive and concerning than what had been publicly known.”

This, of course, was the meeting set up by Trump Jr., who responded to a Russian intermedia­ry’s promise that it would yield informatio­n damaging to Clinton with this inspiratio­nal, highminded message: “If it’s what you say it is, I love it.”

Then there are the detailed findings about the close, longtime relationsh­ips between Manafort and Konstantin Kilimnik, a Russian intelligen­ce officer, and between Manafort and Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska, a Putin intimate who, according to the Senate, has acted as “a proxy for the Russian state and intelligen­ce services” dating back to 2004, when Manafort met him. Manafort, convicted by a federal jury of tax and bank fraud, shared confidenti­al Trump campaign informatio­n, including polling data and campaign strategies, with Kilimnik.

Perhaps Kilimnik simply has a fascinatio­n with American political campaigns, and put this informatio­n on his night stand next to Theodore White’s classic “The Making of the President 1960,” but one may be forgiven for inferring that there are alternativ­e explanatio­ns.

The committee found evidence that Kilimnik was personally tied to Russia’s operation, carried out by Russian intelligen­ce, to interfere in our presidenti­al election. And it concluded that Manafort’s relationsh­ip with Kilimnik “represente­d a grave counterint­elligence threat” to the United States.

And the committee establishe­d that — surprise! — Trump’s sworn denials to the special counsel that he recalled any Trump campaign contacts with Trump adviser Roger Stone, who was a liaison with Russian intelligen­ce operatives about the Democratic emails they had hacked and then released through Wikileaks, were false.

“The committee assesses that Trump did, in fact, speak with Stone about Wikileaks and with members of his campaign about Stone’s access to Wikileaks on multiple occasions,” the committee found.

But Trump is ever-ready with a most persuasive response, certain to keep his loyalists loyal for its sheer gravitas. Like everything else — the Mueller report, Trump’s attempt to extort the Ukrainian president to obtain fabricated dirt on Joe Biden, the COVID-19 pandemic and much, much more — the Senate committee findings were — you guessed it! — “a hoax.” Hooked on the Kool-Aid, incapable of seeing what is in front of their noses, the president’s adherents continue to believe him.

 ?? AP FILE ?? BESTIES: A Republican-led committee has determined that President Trump’s campaign was aware of Russian interferen­ce on their behalf in the 2016 election.
AP FILE BESTIES: A Republican-led committee has determined that President Trump’s campaign was aware of Russian interferen­ce on their behalf in the 2016 election.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States