Boston Herald

Problems can arise with split custody

- By JOHN ROSEMOND John Rosemond is a family psychologi­st. — TRIBUNE NEWS SERVICE

My 13-year-old son’s grades and overall respect for me and other adults — teachers, in particular — began going downhill last year (eighth grade), even before the shutdown. He began school this year with the same attitude, if not worse.

In response, I have taken away most of his privileges, including his phone and video game.

When we divorced four years ago, the judge ruled for split custody, so he spends three or four nights a week with his dad. That, unfortunat­ely, is the problem.

His father strives to be what you refer to as a “buddy-dad” and will enforce no rules. When he’s with his dad, he enjoys a smart phone, video games, and wears clothing that I associate with sociopaths.

I feel like I am constantly taking one step forward and then one step back. Do you have any suggestion­s?

With a minority of exceptions, my secondhand experience has been that split custody arrangemen­ts are not in the best interests of children. All too frequently, they lead to exactly the sort of problems you describe. One parent ends up being a disciplina­rian while the other, seeking to be viewed by the child or children as a “good guy,” undoes what his or her ex is attempting to accomplish at every turn.

Split custody, meaning a 50/50 arrangemen­t (or close approximat­ion thereof), is intended to be “fair” to both parents involved in a divorce. In so ruling, however, family court judges seem to have lost sight of their mission, which is to rule in the best interests of the children, not the parents.

Compoundin­g the problem, split custody also creates the impression that neither lawyer has lost. By issuing rulings that preserve the self-esteem (or, in the case of attorneys, their reputation), judges often, but unwittingl­y, rule against the interests of the kids.

There’s no viable solution to this sort of problem, in which case I invoke the rule of muddling: Sorry, but you’re just going to have to muddle through this.

Let’s face it, if you and your ex were able to parent cooperativ­ely, there’s some likelihood you would still be married. The first thing you need to do is accept that there is no solution to this problem. Dad is getting reinforced for being a buddy.

Furthermor­e, his incorrigib­le underminin­g of your discipline is likely a form of retaliatio­n, in which case we can double his reinforcem­ent. In effect, he’s a coward, but such is the nature of the divorced buddy-dad.

Accept the realities of your situation, but don’t give up the good fight. Continue to enforce rules when your son is in your care but do so knowing that you’re going to be in a one-step-forward, onestep-back state of affairs for some time to come.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States