Boston Herald

Coronaviru­s vaccines Trump’s ‘impossible’ gift to America

- By JAY AMBROSE Jay Ambrose is a syndicated columnist.

It’s Christmas season and President Trump is Santa Claus trying to slide down chimneys, often finding them a tight fit, but working with others to pass out presents that could save a nation: COVID-19 vaccines.

His term is expiring, he’s still trying to overturn the election outcome, and remember news outlets saying this early vaccine was impossible, that Trump was irresponsi­bly misleading people about his Warp Speed program.

NBC said it would take a “miracle to be right” on the vaccine saving lives before the end of the year, and boos were reinvigora­ted after Vice President Mike Pence restated the claim in a debate. Still the public-private partnershi­p worked in scientific­ally instructed coordinati­on as the government abandoned regulation­s handicappi­ng the drug companies and gave them billions of dollars.

Finally, we had CNBC saying the vaccine adventure had “shattered every record in modern medical history,” and we can rejoice at 614,000 people already receiving protective shots and 300 million more in line.

Given his depression over the election, Trump has actually lacked Santa Claus flamboyanc­e. He has been missing an opportunit­y to end his term by buoyantly boosting spirits as his team executes a historic rescue with precision. Of course, the left has never given him credit for anything and has cheaply insisted he is responsibl­e for most of the virus deaths.

Despite Trump’s unforgivab­le bumbles, the real responsibi­lity on most fatality issues rests with the states. The Trump administra­tion has made major moves from the start, and connect the brilliant Pfizer and Moderna pharmaceut­ical firms to the Warp Speed program and we are in a hurrah moment.

This achievemen­t is as joyous as the pandemic has been horrific, but some are worrying about taking the vaccine, others are pointing out that virus dangers have lately been increasing and we’ve got an argument about whether we should have a far-reaching economic shutdown. We shouldn’t. There are ways to protect the most vulnerable without a shutdown that, at its worst, could assure long-term economic wreckage and more deaths.

Trump’s pre-pandemic economic accomplish­ments have helped the country endure the onslaught and we have had numerous indication­s of economic relief when the virus tapers off. It was surely encouragin­g for Pence and President-elect Joe Biden to agree to videos showing them receiving shots.

Trump is clearly down and out because of his election loss and is insistent on recounts that are not going to happen. He should cut it out and the tearfully shocked New York Times should understand this legal frenzy is not a fraction of the attack on our most cherished principles as was easily discovered in the scandalous Mueller investigat­ion.

Then there’s this virus relief bill that could maybe do some good with its $900 billion even as Sherlockia­n journalist­s probe its 5,593 pages and find out, for instance, that we are giving Pakistan $10 million for women’s rights studies. How many Americans is that going to save from the virus?

Who knows what Trump faces in the political afterlife — prosecutor­s have not given up on considerin­g his eligibilit­y for prison — but let’s hope he enjoys the holidays with his family and that at least some fair souls here and there mention his prison reform, record high employment in numerous categories, the highest median income in U.S. history before the pandemic, major peace initiative­s in the Middle East and more needed money for the military, as examples.

To be sure, Trump’s faults are voluminous, but so were the attacks on him for everything and nothing. Virtually eradicatin­g the virus in the United States by the end of 2021 is no small thing, and it could happen.

Merry Christmas.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States