Boston Herald

Feds calculate riskiest places in U.S.

LA County has highest ranking

- — Associated press

Spending her life in Los Angeles, Morgan Andersen knows natural disasters all too well. In college, an earthquake shook her home hard. Her grandfathe­r was affected by recent wildfires in neighborin­g Orange County.

“It’s just that constant reminder, ‘Oh yeah, we live somewhere where there’s natural disasters and they can strike at any time,’ ” said the 29-year-old marketing executive.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency has calculated the risk for every county in America for 18 types of natural disasters, such as earthquake­s, hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, volcanoes and even tsunamis. And of the more than 3,000 counties, Los Angeles County has the highest ranking in the National Risk Index.

The way FEMA calculates the index spotlights places long known as danger spots, like Los Angeles, but some other places highlighte­d run counter to what most people would think. For instance, eastern cities such as New York and Philadelph­ia rank far higher on the risk for tornadoes than tornado alley stalwarts Oklahoma and Kansas.

And the county with the biggest coastal flood risk is one in Washington state that’s not on the ocean, although its river is tidal.

Those seeming oddities occur because FEMA’s index scores how often disasters strike, how many people and how much property are in harm’s way, how vulnerable the population is socially and how well the area is able to bounce back. And that results in a high risk assessment for big cities with lots of poor people and expensive property that are ill-prepared to be hit by once-in-ageneratio­n disasters.

While the rankings may seem “counterint­uitive,” the degree of risk isn’t just how often a type of natural disaster strikes a place, but how bad the toll would be, according to FEMA’s Mike Grimm.

Take tornadoes. Two New York City counties, Philadelph­ia, St. Louis and Hudson County, N.J., are FEMA’s top five riskiest counties for tornadoes. Oklahoma County, Okla. — with more than 120 tornadoes since 1950, including one that killed 36 people in 1999 — ranks 120th.

“They (the top five) are a low frequency, potentiall­y high-consequenc­e event because there’s a lot of property exposure in that area,” said University of South Carolina Hazards & Vulnerabil­ity Research Institute Director Susan Cutter, whose work much of the FEMA calculatio­ns are based on. “Therefore, a small tornado can create a large dollar loss.”

In New York, people are far less aware of the risk and less prepared — and that’s a problem, Grimm said. The day before he said that, New York had a tornado watch. Days later, the National Weather Service tweeted that in 2020 several cities, mostly along the East Coast, had more tornadoes than Wichita, Kansas.

In general, Oklahoma is twice as likely to get tornadoes as New York City, but the damage potential is much higher in New York because there are 20 times the people and nearly 20 times the property value at risk, FEMA officials said.

“It’s that risk perception that it won’t happen to me,” Grimm said. “Just because I haven’t seen it in my lifetime doesn’t mean it won’t happen.”

 ?? Ap file ?? NOT THE SAFEST: Smoke from wildfires burning in Angeles National Forest fills the sky behind the Los Angeles skyline.
Ap file NOT THE SAFEST: Smoke from wildfires burning in Angeles National Forest fills the sky behind the Los Angeles skyline.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States