Boston Herald

Biden’s war against work scores win with Supreme Court

- By ChasE Martin Chase Martin is legal affairs director at the Foundation for Government Accountabi­lity.

Another win for President Joe Biden is another loss for the American people and the power of work.

Biden’s Department of Justice successful­ly asked the Supreme Court of the United States to cancel oral arguments for a lawsuit brought by Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge. Rutledge, from the only state that had actually implemente­d work requiremen­ts in Medicaid before litigation, asked the court to allow her state to keep its Medicaid work requiremen­ts. Why? They were working.

Last month the Foundation for Government Accountabi­lity filed an amicus curiae brief with the court to support Rutledge and provide the data and substance that supports states seeking to improve health outcomes and strengthen their Medicaid programs.

Medicaid was originally designed to provide health insurance to poor Americans with disabiliti­es. But the Affordable Care Act, at least in states that chose to expand coverage, opened Medicaid to a vast, new population of able-bodied adults.

In part to expand the benefits of work requiremen­ts in other welfare programs and to cope with increased enrollment states began submitting waivers to the federal government to experiment with work requiremen­ts in their Medicaid programs.

In Arkansas and other states, the requiremen­ts were designed to increase pathways to self-sufficienc­y and private health care coverage and improve health care outcomes. States also believed, based on other work requiremen­ts in welfare, that these work requiremen­ts would ensure resources are being appropriat­ely spent on the truly needy.

States are being forced to choose between providing health care for healthy single men in their 20s with no children or providing inhome care for the developmen­tally disabled.

And income contribute­s to health outcomes. According to a recent study in the U.K. during the COVID-19 pandemic, people in the bottom 40% of the income distributi­on are almost twice as likely to report poor health as those in the top 20%. More income — not more welfare — makes for healthier Americans and a healthier America.

Under these work requiremen­ts, which can also be satisfied by volunteeri­ng or training, the newly expanded coverage population would need just 80 hours per month to remain eligible for Medicaid.

Work requiremen­ts lift people out of poverty and into more successful and healthy lives. In states like Kansas, work requiremen­ts for food stamps resulted in nearly 13,000 individual­s leaving the food stamp program and within 12 months. Nearly 60% of those leaving the program were gainfully employed and saw incomes rise more than 127%.

During the Trump administra­tion, the Department of Health and Human Services encouraged and approved work requiremen­ts as a key to better health care for the most vulnerable and as a tool for the fiscal sustainabi­lity of Medicaid. In the face of endless distortion­s and attacks from the poverty peddlers on the left within the welfare industrial complex, the Trump administra­tion stood its ground and supported litigation to keep them in place.

What a difference an administra­tion makes.

Each state faces its own set of challenges. But now every state is getting the same medicine — more dependency and more government. For Americans that want to prioritize welfare for the truly needy and lift more Americans into self-sufficienc­y, that’s a tough pill to swallow.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States