Boston Herald

Woke disinforma­tion more pervasive than Russian disinforma­tion

- By rich lowry Rich Lowry is editor of the National Review.

Why do the Russians need to bother spreading disinforma­tion when our own domestic sources do a much better job at it?

We just went through a four-year national obsession with Kremlin disinforma­tion. It supposedly swayed the 2016 presidenti­al election. It was “sowing divisions” in American society. It accounted for the discovery of Hunter Biden’s laptop during the 2020 election.

Social media companies were excoriated for allegedly letting Russian disinfo poison their networks, and the American mind.

There was nothing that some Russian operators — spending a pittance — couldn’t do. The former Time magazine managing editor and Obama state department official Richard Stengel wrote a book called “Informatio­n Wars: How We Lost the Global Battle Against Disinforma­tion and What We Can Do About It.” According to Stengel, the Russians had mounted “an unpreceden­ted attack against the very foundation of our democracy.”

The Russians were amateurs, though. If they really knew what they were doing, they’d spread rank lies about election reforms passed by an American state, make the deceptions so pervasive that the president of the United States would casually repeat them, unjustifia­bly dredge up memories of a terrible period of repression in America, relentless­ly racialize the debate, and intimidate corporate America into thoughtles­sly entering the partisan fight and discrediti­ng itself with a significan­t segment of the population.

No, Russian trolls operating somewhere in St. Petersburg didn’t undertake this highly successful informatio­n operation against the Georgia election law — Stacey Abrams and her allies in media and politics did.

If the Russians were devious enough, they’d take a god-awful mass shooting, ignore all of the evidence about the perpetrato­r’s motives to define it as a crime driven by racial hatred, and undermine faith in the local police and FBI when they presented the facts.

The Russians couldn’t manage this, either — but a veritable army of media commentato­rs and progressiv­e politician­s could. They insisted against the available evidence that the Atlanta spa shooter must have been driven by hatred of Asians, while Democratic senators openly dissented from the FBI director’s statement that the shooting wasn’t a hate crime.

If the Russians had the power or know-how, they’d spin a story of

American law enforcemen­t as a racist occupying force that should be resisted in “largely peaceful” protests all over the country, putting the cops on their back foot and creating an environmen­t of spiraling disorder and violence in some of the most iconic U.S. cities.

The Russians also had nothing to do with this — Black Lives Matter and the media did all of the hard work and have largely managed to ignore the rising tide of crime.

None of this is to dismiss the pernicious influence of Russian informatio­n operations and cyber strikes, especially overseas, or to minimize the hideousnes­s of the Putin regime. But it is galling to see the same people who sounded the klaxons about Russians underminin­g faith in the American system for years themselves spread — or at least accept — progressiv­e narratives based on lies about our own country.

The Russians are never going to stop running their informatio­n campaigns against the West, which date back to the Soviet Union. But they must occasional­ly be tempted to stand back in envy and awe at all that the U.S. promoters of woke narratives have been able to accomplish without them.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States