Boston Herald

Dems: ‘Everything on the line’ in light of news

- By Sean Philip Cotter sean.cotter@bostonhera­ld.com

Bay State Dems pilloried the Supreme Court draft decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, painting a picture of a dire, dystopian future if the sweeping decision ends up being made.

U.S. Rep. Katherine Clark, the assistant House speaker, outside the Massachuse­tts State House called the draft an “attack on our constituti­onal rights on the fundamenta­ls of our democracy.”

She said it would have a “ripple effect is going to affect all of our civil rights and the gains that we have made. So this November, in these races, everything is on the line. Our democracy is on the line.”

Politico reported late Monday night that there was a draft decision circulatin­g in the yet-unruled-upon SCOTUS case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organizati­on, a case involving state abortion restrictio­ns in Mississipp­i. The draft, written by Justice Samuel Alito, would overturn the 1973 decision Roe v. Wade, a well-known ruling that effectivel­y legalized abortion.

If that were to happen, it would be up to states to set abortion law. Little would change practicall­y for Massachuse­tts. Over the past few years, Beacon Hill has passed laws aimed at making sure there’s broad access to abortion in the Bay State.

Spurred by news of the draft, local pols congregate­d on the steps of the State House on Tuesday, including Mayor Michelle Wu, U.S. Attorney Rachael Rollins, Speaker Ron Mariano and state Senate President Karen Spilka.

“I believe this is one of the saddest days in the United States history,” Spilka proclaimed.

Wu said she “suited up for battle” that morning. She said the “right-wing” court draft decision is being pushed by “a fringe minority determined to drive us back.”

Mariano said, “We don’t want to raise the first generation that has less freedoms than their mothers,” and so, “We need to fight back.”

Republican Gov. Charlie Baker tweeted out, “If SCOTUS overturns Roe, it would be a massive setback for women in states without responsibl­e laws protecting abortion access and reproducti­ve health services.”

Republican gubernator­ial candidate Geoff Diehl and Leah Allen, who’s looking to be lieutenant governor as his running mate, said, “We both believe in and reaffirm the need to protect human life wherever and whenever possible.” They called the Massachuse­tts Roe Act, which passed over Baker’s veto, “a radical move too far by state legislator­s here in our state.”

Republican candidate businessma­n Chris Doughty said in a statement, that he would not “seek any changes to our state’s abortion laws.”

“The right to abortion is enshrined in the Massachuse­tts constituti­on,” he said. “I am running to focus on making our state more affordable for our citizens and our job creators.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States