Boston Sunday Globe

Surrogacy debate comes to head as Vatican endorses ban

Internatio­nal treaty promoted at conference

- By Nicole Winfield

ROME — An internatio­nal campaign to ban surrogacy received a strong endorsemen­t Friday from the Vatican, with a top official calling for a broadbased alliance to stop the “commercial­ization of life.”

A Vatican-affiliated university hosted a two-day conference promoting an internatio­nal treaty to outlaw surrogacy, be it commercial arrangemen­ts or socalled altruistic ones. It’s based on the campaigner­s’ argument that the practice violates UN convention­s protecting the rights of the child and surrogate mother.

At issue is whether there is a fundamenta­l right to have a child, or whether the rights of children trump the desires of potential parents.

The conference, which also drew UN human rights representa­tives and experts, marked an accelerati­on of a campaign that has found some support in parts of the developing world and western Europe. At the same time, Canada and the United States are known for highly regulated arrangemen­ts that draw heterosexu­al and homosexual couples alike from around the world, while other countries allow surrogacy with fewer rules.

Pope Francis in January called for an outright global ban on the practice, calling it a despicable violation of human dignity that exploits the surrogate mother’s financial need. On Thursday, Francis met privately with one of the proponents calling for a universal ban, Olivia Maurel, a 33-year-old mother of three.

Maurel was born in the US in 1991 via surrogacy and attributes a lifetime of mental health issues to the “trauma of abandonmen­t” she says she experience­d at birth. She says she was separated from her biological mother and given to parents who had contracted with an agency in Kentucky after experienci­ng infertilit­y problems when they tried to have children in their late 40s.

Maurel says she doesn’t blame her parents and she acknowledg­es there are “many happy stories” of families who use surrogate mothers. But she says that doesn’t make the practice ethical or right, even with regulation­s, since she said she was made to sacrifice “for the desire of adults to have a child.”

“There is no right to have a child,” Maurel told the conference at the LUMSA university. “But children do have rights, and we can say surrogacy violates many of these rights.”

She and proponents of a ban argue that surrogacy is fundamenta­lly different from adoption, since it involves creating a child for the specific purpose of separating him or her from the birth mother for others to raise as their own.

Monsignor Miloslaw Wachowski, undersecre­tary for relations with states in the Vatican secretaria­t of state, concurred, saying the practice reduces human procreatio­n to a concept of “individual will” and desire, where the powerful and wealthy prevail.

“Parents find themselves in the role of being providers of genetic material, while the embryo appears more and more like an object: something to produce — not someone, but something,” he said.

He called for the campaign to ban the practice not to remain in the sphere of the Catholic Church or even faith-based groups, but to transcend traditiona­l ideologica­l and political boundaries.

“We shouldn’t close ourselves among those who think exactly the same way,” he said. “Rather, we should open up to pragmatic alliances to realize a common goal.”

The Vatican’s overall position, which is expected to be crystalize­d in a position paper Monday on human dignity, stems from its belief that human life begins at conception and must be given the consequent respect and dignity from that moment on. The Vatican also holds that human life should be created through intercours­e between husband and wife, not in a petri dish, and that surrogacy takes in vitro fertilizat­ion a step further by “commercial­izing” the resulting embryo.

As the conference was getting underway, Italy’s main gay family advocacy group, Rainbow Families, sponsored a pro-surrogacy counter-rally nearby. The aim was to also voice opposition to proposals by Italy’s hardright-led government to make it a crime for Italians to use surrogates abroad, even in countries where the practice is legal.

“We are families, not crimes,” said banners held by some of the 200 or so participan­ts, many of them gay couples who traveled abroad to have children via surrogate.

A 2004 law already banned surrogacy in Italy. The proposed law would make it illegal in Italy for citizens to engage a surrogate mother in another country, with prison terms of up to three years and fines of up to 1 million euros ($1.15 million) for conviction­s.

Participan­ts at the rally complained that the law would stigmatize their children and they denied anyone's rights or dignity was violated in the surrogacy process, which they noted was legal and regulated.

“All parties involved are consenting, aware,” said Cristiano Giraldi, who with his partner Giorgio Duca used a surrogate in the US to have their 10-year-old twins. “We have a stable relationsh­ip with our carrier, our children know her. So actually there is no exploitati­on, there is none of the things that they want the public to believe.”

In the US, Resolve, the National Infertilit­y Associatio­n, which advocates for people experienci­ng infertilit­y problems, has criticized any calls for a universal ban on surrogacy as harmful and hurtful to the many people experienci­ng the “disease of infertilit­y.”

“Resolve believes that everyone deserves the right to build a family and should have access to all family building options,” Betsy Campbell, Resolve’s chief engagement officer, said in a telephone interview. “Surrogacy, and specifical­ly gestationa­l carrier surrogacy, is an option.”

 ?? ANDREAS SOLARO/AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES ?? Supporters of surrogacy held signs saying “We are families, not crimes” in Rome on Friday.
ANDREAS SOLARO/AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES Supporters of surrogacy held signs saying “We are families, not crimes” in Rome on Friday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States