Calhoun Times

Weekend Bible Reflection­s With Jon

-

As we continue our study of Hebrew’s mention of Melchizede­k’s priesthood in chapter 7, we come to the main purpose behind the Lord inspiring the author to mention the Old Testament priest in the first place. The overall purpose of the book of Hebrews was to show the superiorit­y of Christiani­ty over Judaism to encourage Jewish Christians to not fall back into Judaism due to pressure from persecutio­n.

Hebrews already introduced the concept of Christ serving as the Christian’s high priest (2:17-18; 4:14-16). The mention of Melchizede­k shows how Christ’s priesthood is superior to the Levitical priesthood of the law of Moses.

“Perfection” (v. 11) comes from a Greek word which literally means completion. The Levitical priesthood was not complete or adequate. Hebrews will later show that its major failing was its failure to provide forgivenes­s of sins (10:1ff). Thus, God deliberate­d for another priest to arise from an order different than Aaron’s priesthood, a priest who had more in common with Melchizede­k than Aaron (v. 11). This was prophesied (Psalm 110:4), showing that it had always been God’s plan for Jesus to serve as the high priest mankind truly needed.

Verse 12 is significan­t because it shows the difference between the Old and New Testaments. As Hebrews will bring out in chapter 8, the Old Testament law of Moses and its Levitical priesthood has been replaced by the New Testament law of Christ, who also serves as the Christian’s high priest. With Christ now serving as our high priest and the Levitical priesthood no longer needed, it stands to reason that the Law of Moses is likewise no longer in place and has been replaced with the New Testament. The fact that the new covenant has replaced the old is one of the reasons Christ serves as high priest in the first place (vs. 13-14). Christ came from the tribe of Judah.

Under the Law of Moses, priests were commanded to come from the tribe of Levi. Nothing was said in the Old Testament about priests coming from Judah, and yet Christ serves as our high priest. The only way that could happen is if the Law of Moses was no longer in effect and replaced with a new covenant which propagated a different priesthood.

The Hebrew writer’s mention of Christ being “descended from Judah, and in connection with that tribe Moses said nothing about priests” (v. 14) also gives insight into how one properly ascertains authority from Scripture for one’s religious beliefs and practices.

If the Old Testament were still in effect, Christ – a descendant of Judah – could not be high priest. This would be so not even though there is no Old Testament verse stating, “Thou shalt not have priests from the tribe of Judah.” The only commands God ever gave Moses concerning the Old Testament priesthood mentioned descendanc­y from Levi. Thus, all other tribes were excluded from being priests.

When you go to a restaurant and tell the waiter you want a cheeseburg­er and fries and mention no other items on the menu, the waiter automatica­lly understand­s that your silence concerning everything else on the menu indicates that all you want is a cheeseburg­er and fries. As a customer, you would be upset if he brought you something different from or in addition to what you ordered and expected you to pay for it.

Our lord purchased the church with his own blood (Acts 20:28). He has revealed in scripture what he wants concerning how we are saved, how we worship, and how we organize and conduct ourselves in his church. If we add anything to what he has revealed he has wanted, we sin and displease him even if he had not condemned what we do with a “Thou shalt not” (Galatians 1:6-9; Proverbs 30:6; Revelation 22:18-19).

Next week’s column will continue our study of chapter 7, lord willing.

 ??  ?? Jon Mitchell
Jon Mitchell

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States