Calhoun Times

Residents ask that Ga. Power’s Hammond coal ash be relocated

- By Doug Walker DWalker@CalhounTim­es.com

Georgians from Valdosta to Rome worried Tuesday night if a permit for Georgia Power to cap-in-place Ash Pond 3 at Plant Hammond might set a dangerous precedent for other plants where the utility also wants to close toxic ash ponds in place close to water supplies.

Dozens of residents from all over Georgia, raised their electronic hands for two hours during a virtual public hearing to express a steady stream of objections to the cap-in-place for the 25-acre ash pond just to the east of the abandoned power plant.

During the EPD presentati­on prior to taking comment, a spokesman said that prior to the closure and constructi­on of a cover over the ash pond, which was completed in 2018, that storm water was allowed to infiltrate approximat­ely 50 feet of ash uncontroll­ed and that groundwate­r levels in the ash ranged from zero to nine and half feet.”

Coal ash is known to include traces of toxic chemicals ranging from boron and strontium to cobalt, arsenic, and hexavalent chromium.

A woman identified as Linda Bell who said she was a former Rome resident who now lives close to Plant McDonough in Cobb County.

“I think this being the first hearing it will likely set the precedent for what is designed for Plant McDonough.” Bell said. I don’t think it’s going too far to say you’re going to set the precedent for all other states so this is a very important decision.”

Bell, like most of the speakers, said they want Ash Pond 3 to be completely excavated and the coal ash stored in lined pits a safe distance from the water supply.

Gini Seitz, a resident Juliette, Georgia, site of Plant Scherer called the cap-in-place plan unethical and immoral.

“It is irresponsi­ble for Georgia Power to leave a million tons worth of toxic coal ash submerged 50 feet into the ground forever,” Seitz said.

The ash pond actually contains over a million cubic yards of coal combustion residue.

Chris Bowers with the Southern Environmen­tal Law Center argued that the draft permit contains numerous flaws.

“So-called free liquids must be eliminated within the waster pit and the waste pit must be closed such that the probabilit­y that the future impoundmen­t of water sediment or slurry is precluded,” Bowers said. “Coal ash sitting in an unlined pit beneath the water table renders these standards impossible to meet.”

Georgia Power says it is meeting all standards for

safety

Georgia Power’s Director of Environmen­tal Affairs Aaron Mitchell said the plan to close Ash Pond 3 complies with all federal and state performanc­e standards. The utility has put 18 monitoring wells in place on site.

“The engineerin­g methods are specific for this pond and are designed for the protection of groundwate­r during and throughout the closure,” Mitchell said. “The conditions in the permit will require corrective action for the groundwate­r if needed and I think it’s important to note that test results from the monitoring performed at Hammond Ash Pond 3 meet the federal primary drinking water standards today.”

Rome resident Shelly Peller wondered how the close-in-place permit is even being debated.

“We need to do everything we can to ensure that our groundwate­r is safe, that our soil is safe, that our waterways are safe, it doesn’t sound like it’s rocket science,” Peller said. It’s for those downstream, people talk about environmen­tal migration, there are parts of the country that are losing their water.”

There was no actual debate during the virtual hearting. The Georgia EPD made note of the comments are told participan­ts that responses to questions would be responded to in writing and posted online.

Vivian McWilliams alluded to the fact that three other ash ponds at Plant Hammond are being excavated and the ash relocated to other off-cite disposal pits.

“What’s the difference with this site?” McWilliams asked.

Former Berry College professor Steven Bell claimed the site should not be called an ash pond but a “toxic mountain.”

Citizens clamor for change of

plan

“Everyone deserves access to clean and safe water and there is a cheaper way and a right way. I’m asking you guys to do it the right way,” said Cailie Duvall, a mother of four and resident on Weiss Lake.

“It’s not too late to correct course... require Georgia Power to excavate AP 3 and move the coal ash to a modern, dry, lined facility with a leachate collection system “said Coosa River Basin Initiative Director Jesse Demonbreun-Chapman.

Georgia Power’s Mitchell concluded his comments by pledging that Georgia Power was committed to a safe, effective closure of Ash Pond 3.

The Georgia EPD will continue to take written comment on the ash pond closure through September 10. Comments may be made via email to epd. comments@dnr.ga.gov..

 ?? Doug Walker, File ?? This 2019 file photo shows a view of Ash Pond 3 near Georgia Power’s Plant Hammond in Rome.
Doug Walker, File This 2019 file photo shows a view of Ash Pond 3 near Georgia Power’s Plant Hammond in Rome.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States