Call & Times

Invenergy has backup plan for plant water

Narraganse­tt Indian Tribe agrees to provide a Plan B for facility

- By RUSS OLIVO rolivo@woonsocket­call.com

BURILLVILL­E – With its plans to obtain turbine-cooling water from Johnston facing a legal challenge, the developers of the proposed Clear River Energy Center have informed state regulators that the Narraganse­tt Indian Tribe has agreed to provide backup supplies for the facility. Chicago-based Invenergy Thermal Developmen­t disclosed the agreement with the Narraganse­tts in a supplement­al filing with state regulators several days ago.

The company said Benn Water & Heavy Transport, a Hopkinton-based pool-filling company, is also a backup supplier of water for the plant. The company had previously

identified Benn Water as the primary delivery company, but the new paperwork says Benn Water could potentiall­y supply all the facility’s needs from an unidentifi­ed municipali­ty with a water treatment plant capable of churning out 26 million gallons of water per day.

If Clear River draws from the Narraganse­tts, the water would come from wells in the Lower Wood Aquifer – part of what is known as the Pawcatuck Basin, which stretches across the southern part of the state and nearby Connecticu­t.

“The tribe has sovereign control over approximat­ely 1,942 acres known as the tribe’s “Tribal Lands,” Invenergy told the Energy Facility Siting Board. “CREC has sampled the water chemistry and believes that it will meet the water quality requiremen­ts of the Facility and that the tribal well water system capacity has the ability to also fully meet the water requiremen­ts of the facility.”

The water from the Narraganse­tts would be delivered to the proposed plant by Benn Water, Invenergy said.

At Invenergy’s request, the EFSB allowed various details of the company’s supplement­ary water supply plan to be redacted from the latest filing, including the identity of the municipali­ty from which Benn would draw water. The company argued that certain informatio­n about sources and prices is not covered by the Access to Open Records Act.

“Both agreements are private agreements entered into by business entities for a commercial purpose,” Invenergy’s legal papers say. “Disclosing this informatio­n, especially the business relationsh­ips and supply source locations of Benn Water, would be anticompet­itive and could disadvanta­ge the commercial interests of Benn Water. Other companies could also use the informatio­n contained in these agreements to the detriment of Invenergy, Benn Water and the tribe in future business transactio­ns.”

The availabili­ty of water has been a perennial source of controvers­y for the plant, which is hotly contested in Burrillvil­le – and across a wide swath of the state.

The company proposes building a $700 million, 900megawat­t co-generation plant on a rural tract of land off Wallum Lake Road in the town’s Pascoag section. The primary feeder fuel for the plant would be natural gas, though Invenergy says it could fall back on diesel oil under limited conditions.

The existing plan for the CREC plant is a modificati­on of the original, which would have required an estimated 1 million gallons of water a day to operate.

After failing to secure agreements to purchase water from the Pascoag Utility District and the Harrisvill­e Fire District, the company altered the design of the plant, adopting a more costly cooling system that relies more heavily on recycled water and markedly reduces the plant’s needs to about 15,000 gallons a day. Instead of building a pipeline to bring water to the plant, as called for in the original plan, all of its needs can be satisfied with two to three deliveries a day by tanker trucks.

A key component of the opposition to Invenergy’s first choice – the Pascoag Utility District – was driven by concerns over drawing water from wells that have been closed as a source for drinking-quality supplies since they were polluted by a gasoline additive over a decade ago. Invenergy later approached the city of Woonsocket with an $18 million offer to purchase supplies from its water department for 20 years.

The Town Council and other local officials made a plea to the Woonsocket City Council to reject the deal. The city council voted to stand with Burrillvil­le against Invenergy in early January, but on the very same night, the Johnston Town Council approved an identical deal at the urging of Mayor Joseph Polisena.

That deal, too, remains uncertain.

Johnston gets all of its water from the Scituate Reservoir, which is controlled by the Providence Water Supply Board. The town says it has unrestrict­ed leeway to resell any quantity of water it obtains from those sources to any commercial entity – even a power plant across the Johnston line.

But the town of Burrillvil­le and the Conservati­on Law Foundation disagree. Citing a little-known state law on the books for more than a century, they filed suit in Superior Court against Invenergy and the town of Johnston in March, arguing that Johnston’s plan to resell Scituate Reservoir water is unlawful.

While a decision is pending, Invenergy’s disclosure of new backup agreements with the Narraganse­tts and Benn Water may render the case moot. Invergy’s lawyers say Johnston is still its first choice and have indicated they don’t consider the lawsuit a serious threat.

Invenergy’s disclosure­s come as the EFSB enters the final countdown to a decision on the company’s applicatio­n for a permit to build CREC. The EFSB will preside over the last public hearing on local turf next Tuesday in the auditorium of Burrillvil­le High School. The panel has also set aside 14 dates through mid-December for preliminar­y motions and evidentiar­y hearings on the plant, which is opposed not just by this town, but 32 of the state’s 39 communitie­s in all.

Under the Energy Facility Siting Act, the EFSB must render a decision on Invenergy’s request no later than 60 days after the conclusion of the hearing.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States