Call & Times

How to be more human in the new year? Try less.

- By EVE FAIRBANKS

Over Christmas, a couple of friends and I took a trip to a farm called Riverstill. The farm is near the South AfricaBots­wana border, a 500-mile dust trail patrolled by scorpions, a few cattle and giant ants the size of a person's pinkie fingernail. On Christmas morning, I sat on the riverbank to think. After a few minutes, I noticed the patch of dust to the right of my thigh, which had been bare, had suddenly sprouted an anthill.

I've always been fascinated by ants: not by their discipline but by their product. Ants are artists. They could just throw the dirt they evacuate from their nests out of the hole, like gophers do, but they don't. Some are potters: Harvester ants make beautiful, nearsymmet­rical concentric circles from the mud, like the ribbed vases sold in high-end ceramic studios. Others are sculptors, wrapping moist dirt particles around the tiniest of sticks to create oblong pellets. And still others are architects, molding bits of detritus into convex shapes so rainwater can run off. Ants remind me of a few people I know who are unwilling to see anything in their worlds go unused or unloved. They make elaborate statues out of restaurant straws or fold every piece of junk mail into origami before throwing it away. At the Riverstill farm, the giant ants by the river made a heap of arresting little balls, perfectly round as tapioca pearls.

Humans tend to think our bragging point, as a species, is that we create. We solve problems, we improve ourselves and our societies, we make art. I read a book on this theme called "Mastery" by Robert Greene, one of the last decade's most enduringly popular self-help books. In it, Greene proposes that what separates people from animals is that animals suffer from "passivity," from the failure to see the world as a canvas for their self-expression or betterment, whereas humans are "creative." Animals, he claims, "live in the world as it is," "locked in a perpetual present," "easily distracted by what is in front of their eyes."

Fortunatel­y, he writes, "our ancestors overcame this basic animal weakness ...they became more creative." Where a cockatoo sees just a stick, or maybe a perch, we see one half of a potential device for whipping up a fire, and thus a feast, and thus steel forges and steam trains and civilizati­ons.

This is the season of New Year's resolution­s. For most of us, that takes the form of plans, of projects, of dedication, however brief, to creation and self-improvemen­t. One friend of mine resolved to make $70,000 by freelance consulting and get strong enough to do crow's pose in yoga. Another resolved to write more blogs and articles. Yet another posted a video on Facebook outlining his broad resolution "to become more proactive."

"I am unfortunat­ely a little bit of a procrastin­ator," he spoke mournfully into his iPhone lens. Its fluorescen­t flash lighting and slight fisheye distortion gave the video the look of a jailhouse confes- sion. His expression was downcast. "I come up with these great ideas, and then I lack the ability to follow through." He is a physician, so his first effort to fulfill his resolution consisted of broadcasti­ng a health tip for his patients and other viewers. "So today," he said, without a hint of irony, "my first tip is around the concept of acceptance."

"Sleep is the only proper realm for inactivity," the psychologi­st Erich Fromm declared in the '50s; by now we have fully internaliz­ed this so-called truth. We worship activity, creativity, or, to lift a phrase from another big, recent self-help book, "generativi­ty"; we act as if we are nothing unless we are constantly reorganizi­ng, altering or impressing ourselves upon our environmen­t. One person I know has made her career leading "feminine power" courses, the idea being that femininity literally doesn't exist unless it exerts power. We're driven, in part, by the idea Greene articulate­s explicitly: If we're not constantly doing, we will die. If we're not changing ourselves or the world around us, then we are essentiall­y making things worse, falling asleep at the wheel, betraying the essential potentiali­ty of our humanness. "The moment you rest, a part of your mind enters a phase of decay," Greene warns. "You will lose your hardearned creativity and others begin to sense it."

I felt that pressure even on vacation. At one point, one of my friends came to join me at the river. The place, and the moment, was beautiful, and I found myself seized by the need to say something to him about it. These observatio­ns were very banal. "The sky is a gorgeous color this afternoon," I chattered. "If you dive down deep, you'll feel the water at the bottom is colder than at the top." "Did you notice this new anthill?" But the feeling was utterly clear: If I didn't make reality by commenting upon it, then both it, and I, would somehow lose something essential, or vanish.

As I looked at the ants, though, I began to think that humans' special capacity, if there is such a thing, isn't really pure creativity but just the opposite: appreciati­on or wonder. I suspect the author of "Mastery" has never owned a pet, or else he never would have said what he did about animals. Out here on the Botswana border, there are far more animals than people, so it's a useful place to remind us what animal nature really is. Greene says the great danger for human beings is to "give in to feelings of fear, boredom, and confusion," because that's what animals do. Well, the ants I watched for a full half-hour on Christmas morning never rested. The weaver birds that darted back and forth across the moss-green river little yellow sparrowlik­e creatures who build pocketlike nests on the ends of branches that they scrape clean with their beaks so they can more easily see snakes prowl the world regarding everything for its potential use: a dry leaf, a string, a leftover gift-wrap ribbon are all things to pluck up to be woven into a nest.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States