Call & Times

Prefab... it was just a fad

Prefab houses were once the ‘holy grail of design.’ So why aren’t there more of them?

- By MICHELE LERNER Special To The Washington Post

Design magazines love them. So do movie stars and environmen­tal activists. New technology, including the use of robots in factories, makes them even easier to build.

So why are advocates of prefab houses still talking about “disrupting” the home-building industry?

Architects, environmen­talists and some forward-thinking builders embrace prefab constructi­on – whose products run the gamut from affordable manufactur­ed homes to sleek tiny houses with ultramoder­n finishes to contempora­ry mansions – as the way every home should be built in the future, says Greenwich, Connecticu­t-based Sheri Koones, author of “Prefabulou­s + Almost Off the Grid” and other books about prefab houses. But despite having been around for decades, prefab or modular homes made up just 2 percent of new single-family houses in 2016, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

Prefab constructi­on gained traction in the 1970s when builders and architects recognized they could save on build time and labor costs by moving the majority of the building process into a factory. Initially, says Koones, modular homes were fairly basic and boxy, but over time architects, builders and factory owners have improved their methods, and nearly anything that can be built on a homesite can now be assembled first in a factory.

While prefab houses can cost less than a traditiona­lly built home, the financial savings are not always the most compelling reason for people to choose this constructi­on method. “The real saving is in time,” says Brian Abramson, co-founder and director of business operations for Method Homes, a prefab factory in Seattle that works mostly on modern, custom homes. “It typically takes 50 percent less constructi­on time to complete a prefab house.”

Building the house in a factory limits weather delays and makes the delivery date more predictabl­e. Change orders are usually not allowed, which also speeds constructi­on.

Fewer hours on-site translates into some saving on labor costs. Michael Winn, owner of Winn Design + Build in Falls Church, which uses prefab constructi­on for additions and custom-built homes, estimates that prefab constructi­on can save as much as 15 to 20 percent compared with the cost of a traditiona­l custom build.

The “cool” factor has also helped fuel interest. Actor and environmen­tal activist Robert Redford is so enamored of prefab building that he has written introducti­ons to several of Koones’ books. Design magazines and blogs regularly showcase prefab houses.

Modern-style architectu­re is commonly associated with modular constructi­on simply because the clean lines and flat surfaces can be shrink-wrapped and stacked on a truck more easily than the parts of a Victorian-style home, says Mimi Hoang, co-founder and principal of

nARCHITECT­S in Brooklyn, designers of microunits in Manhattan that were built with modular constructi­on.

But as long as the architect understand­s the guidelines of the engineerin­g that takes place in the factory, there’s really no limit to what you can build with modular constructi­on, says Mark Giarraputo, an architect with Studio Z Design Concepts in Bethesda, Maryland. “You can do any style you want from traditiona­l to Craftsman to Colonial to Tudor or contempora­ry,” says Giarraputo. “Prefab lends itself a little more to contempora­ry homes because of the clean lines, but you’re not limited to that style.”

A significan­t turning point for prefab homes came in 2002-03, when Dwell magazine held a competitio­n for architects to design a $200,000 prefab house, says Ryan Smith, director of the Integrated Technology in Architectu­re Collaborat­ive at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City. Suddenly, prefab houses were the epitome of cool architectu­re.

“Prefab constructi­on became the holy grail of design,” says Joseph Tanney, co-founder of Resolution: 4 Architectu­re in New York City, winner of the 2002 Dwell magazine competitio­n. “The idea was that it would be the answer for modern, affordable, mass-produced housing. We’ve seen far fewer prefab factories than what we expected.”

Some of the buzz around prefab architectu­re continues, says Tanney, enticing architects to create renderings for prefab houses and occasional­ly build one. More than half of the 15 to 20 houses Resolution builds annually are prefab. But the reality is that most prefab houses are more pedestrian, Tanney says: “Most modular factories are building prefab houses for communitie­s that are naturally more traditiona­l to attract more buyers. The excitement around modern prefab architectu­re is just because it’s more interestin­g.”

Smith says that prefab housing is more common in other countries, particular­ly Sweden, Japan and Germany. “The difference is that they tend to be production-based, so the homes all look alike, even if they are high-end homes. The North American preference is for more customizat­ion.”

Tanney says prefab constructi­on hasn’t changed architectu­re, although it’s gotten more people outside of the architectu­re world interested, and the quality of the buildings has improved over the past 15 years. “I expect to see more single-family home production with prefab constructi­on in the future,” says Smith. “But not custom, high-end prefab homes. That’s more of a novelty.”

Today, modular parts can even be constructe­d by robots in some factories, which addresses the current shortage of constructi­on labor. Parts are put together on-site in a few weeks rather than months. “Prefab constructi­on is the best-kept secret in America,” says Koones. “Every house should be built this way, but most builders want to build the way they always have. They can charge more money when they use traditiona­l methods, too.”

Among those interested in shifting the pattern of home building is Prefab Partners (PFP) in the District of Columbia, founded by Steve Salis and John Thompson. The two met when they built the first &Pizza restaurant together on H Street NE. This is Salis’ first foray into residentia­l constructi­on, but Thompson has been in the business for 14 years and saw the potential for the prefab method.

“I had an ‘aha’ moment with a pizza oven when I started &Pizza, and I had the same experience when we started looking into how to disrupt the building industry,” Salis says. “We’re building the first houses in the city out of panels built by robots.”

While you might expect that type of innovation in one of the city’s hip neighborho­ods such as the Wharf or Shaw, PFP’s first two houses, which it calls “farmhouse modern,” are on Foxhall Road NW in the Palisades. “We made sure the houses will look right in the neighborho­od and work with the local DNA, but still have contempora­ry features inside,” Salis says.

Each of the homes, which were prefabrica­ted at Blueprint Robotics in Baltimore, is priced at $1.995 million and has 4,320 square feet with five bedrooms and five bathrooms.

 ??  ?? Above, a HOMB house in Portland, Ore., by Skylab Architectu­re and Method Homes is based on 100-square-foot triangular modules. At right, this Taos, N.M., home is a six-module, three-bedroom, three-bath Method Cabin designed by Prentiss Balance Wickline Architects built over a sitebuilt lower level that contains a garage, ski room and game room. Below, this Bethesda, Md., house, designed by Studio Z and built by Sandy Spring Builders in 2010, has about 7,300 square feet of finished space created from 16 modules built in a Virginia factory.
Above, a HOMB house in Portland, Ore., by Skylab Architectu­re and Method Homes is based on 100-square-foot triangular modules. At right, this Taos, N.M., home is a six-module, three-bedroom, three-bath Method Cabin designed by Prentiss Balance Wickline Architects built over a sitebuilt lower level that contains a garage, ski room and game room. Below, this Bethesda, Md., house, designed by Studio Z and built by Sandy Spring Builders in 2010, has about 7,300 square feet of finished space created from 16 modules built in a Virginia factory.
 ?? Photos courtesy of Michael Cogliantry, Jerry Courvoisie­r and Stu Estler, respective­ly ??
Photos courtesy of Michael Cogliantry, Jerry Courvoisie­r and Stu Estler, respective­ly
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States