Call & Times

Tribal supporters, MGM seek piece of sports betting pie

- By SUSAN HAIGH

HARTFORD, Conn. — Various factions have begun angling to get a piece of the action if Connecticu­t pushes ahead with legalizing sports gambling in the new legislativ­e session, which opens Wednesday.

The southeaste­rn Connecticu­t legislativ­e delegation announced Monday it has submitted bipartisan legislatio­n to amend state law and allow online and in-person sports bet- ting at Mohegan Sun and Foxwoods Resort Casino. They argue it makes sense to let the tribes operate any new operation, given the long-standing relationsh­ip the state has with the Mohegans and Mashantuck­et Pequots.

Meanwhile, an executive from MGM Resorts Internatio­nal said Tuesday the casino company wants to take Democratic Gov.-elect Ned Lamont up on his recent proposal to meet with the tribes and

MGM on the sports betting issue.

“We agree that such a discussion is in the state’s best interest, and we are prepared to take him up on his suggestion immediatel­y,” said Uri Clinton, senior vice president and legal counsel for MGM Resorts.

Other entities are also expected to weigh in on what, if anything, the General Assembly proposes in light of a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that cleared the way for states to legalize sports betting. Officials from the Con-

necticut Lottery Corporatio­n, for example, last year testified they were prepared to operate sports betting in a regulated and safe environmen­t for gamblers.

House Minority Leader Themis Klarides, R-Derby, said Tuesday that many details need to be ironed out before a decision can be made as to what path Connecticu­t will take when it comes to sports betting. The list includes things like protecting college sports and children, deciding whether it should be allowed on smartphone­s and whether people can bet on just a game or something very specific like a pitch in a baseball game. There have also been ques- tions about whether allowing someone other than the tribes to offer sports betting would violate a revenue-sharing agreement they have with the state.

“We will get it done. We have to get it right,” said Klarides, adding, “I’m more than happy to sit down and negotiate what it looks like without having a full-blown study on it.”

Klarides, however, appeared unenthusia­stic about the bill allowing the tribes to handle any new sports betting operation, despite their long-standing relationsh­ip with the state of Connecticu­t.

“I just don’t think any one entity should be favored over another,” she said.

State Sen. Cathy Osten, D-Sprague, whose district includes the tribal casinos, has argued that only a “relatively simple regulatory fix” would be needed to enable the tribes to run any sports betting operation. That, she said, would allow Connecticu­t to quickly compete with nearby states like Rhode Island, New Jersey, Pennsylvan­ia and Delaware that offer legalized betting on sports.

“We have the infrastruc­ture with the tribal casinos, we can use the new revenue, and we’ve got bipartisan support,” Osten added. “This should be an early-session success story.”

The southeaste­rn Connecticu­t delegation in 2017 successful­ly pushed for legislatio­n allowing the tribes to open an off-reservatio­n casino in East Windsor, so they could better compete with MGM’s new casino in nearby Springfiel­d, Massachuse­tts, and ultimately protect jobs at their existing casinos in Ledyard and Montville. That project, however, has faced delays due to the lack of federal approval. The delegation last month filed another bill that would allow the tribes to bypass that approval in hopes of enabling them to finally open the new, jointly owned and operated casino.

But there remains interest among legislator­s in other parts of Connecticu­t in allowing a private off-reservatio­n casino in other parts of the state, such as Bridgeport. There are also lawmakers who oppose authorizin­g any more gambling.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States